On the Cellular Convexity of Complexes

In this paper we discuss cellular convexity of complexes. A new definition of cellular convexity is given in terms of a geometric property. Then it is proven that a regular complex is celiularly convex if and only if there is a convex plane figure of which it is the cellular image. Hence, the definition of cellular convexity by Sklansky [7] is equivalent to the new definition for the case of regular complexes. The definition of Minsky and Papert [4] is shown to be equivalent to our definition. Therefore, aU definitions are virtually equivalent. It is shown that a regular complex is cellularly convex if and only if its minimum-perimeter polygon does not meet the boundary of the complex. A 0(n) time algorithm is presented to determine the cellular convexity of a complex when it resides in n × m cells and is represented by the run length code.

[1]  S. H. Unger,et al.  Pattern Detection and Recognition , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[2]  Jerome Feder,et al.  Languages of Encoded Line Patterns , 1968, Inf. Control..

[3]  L. Hodes Discrete Approximation of Continuous Convex Blobs , 1970 .

[4]  Ugo Montanari On Limit Properties in Digitization Schemes , 1970, JACM.

[5]  Jack Sklansky,et al.  Recognition of convex blobs , 1970, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Connectivity in Digital Pictures , 1970, JACM.

[7]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Determining the Convex Hull of a Finite Planar Set , 1972, Inf. Process. Lett..

[8]  Jack Sklansky,et al.  Minimum-Perimeter Polygons of Digitized Silhouettes , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[9]  Dennis F. Kibler,et al.  A Theory of Nonuniformly Digitized Binary Pictures , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.