The Application of Neohumanist Principles in Information Systems Development

ABSTRACT While increasing attention is being given to neohumanist principles in informationsystems development, much of the literature on the subject is enigmatic. Examplesof neohumanist principles application are also lacking. In this paper, we attemptto articulate, in general terms, various neohumanist principles which can hopefullybecome part of the value system of the systems developer. Additionally, we offerfour brief examples of research projects which illustrate how the neohumanistprinciples of mutual understanding and emancipation might be implemented ininformation systems development. 1. INTRODUCTION There has been a growing interest in using neohu manist principles to gain a deeper understandingof the technical and social issues of information systems development (ISD). This interest hasparticularly focused on Critical Social Theory (CS T). Whereas the attention given to CST has ledto many interesting conceptual developments (cf. Lyytinen and Klein 1985; Lyytinen 1986;Lyytinen and Hirschheim 1988; Ngwenyama 1987, 1991; Lee 1991), it is not very clear how itsmaxims and principles can be applied in practice for two reasons. One, although there are a numberof books on Critical Social Theory written by Jurgen Habermas and his colleagues, the languageis fairly obscure and difficult to understand even for those with some philosophical background.Two, there is virtually a total lack of illustrative cases and procedural guidelines for practicalapplications of CST. Habermas himself has unfortunately not addressed this issue satisfactorily.Therefore, this paper has two primary purposes: (1 ) to provide a brief overview of the major tenetsof CST arising from our interpretation of Habermas ' seminal writings and (2) to provide four briefexamples of projects which illustrate how some key principles of CST could be implemented,particularly those associated with emancipation. This latter point amounts to a reinterpreting of theprojects from the vantage point of Critical Social Theory. Note, however, that this does not requirethat the projects were actually informed by CST.Although this paper is concerned with the application of neohumanist principles in informationsystems development, the notion of neohumanism itself needs some elaboration. Neohumanismmay be described as a ``paradigm'' (cf. Burrell and Morgan 1979; Hirschheim and Klein 1989)whose assumptions are associated with seeking change, emancipation and potentiality, and with

[1]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[2]  L. Mathiassen,et al.  Professional systems development: experience, ideas and action , 1990 .

[3]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proc. of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on Information systems design methodologies: improving the practice , 1986 .

[4]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[5]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[6]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: A Comparison and Evaluation of SAMPO with OSSAD and ICN , 1992, Comput. J..

[8]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[9]  G. R. Gladden Stop the life-cycle, I want to get off , 1982, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes.

[10]  Dragan Milovanovic,et al.  Book Review: Review of the Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[11]  David Held,et al.  Habermas: Critical Debates. , 1984, Contemporary Sociology.

[12]  Karel Kosík,et al.  Die Dialektik des Konkreten Eine Studie Zur Problematik des Menschen Und der Welt , 1967 .

[13]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Mapping Situations within a System Development Project.: An Intervention Perspective on Organizational Change , 1984 .

[14]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[15]  Peter Naur,et al.  Intuition in Software Development , 1985, TAPSOFT, Vol.2.

[16]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas's theory of communicative action , 1988 .

[17]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis , 1983 .

[18]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies , 1986 .

[19]  Peter Naur,et al.  Programming as theory building , 1985 .

[20]  D. Kolb,et al.  Organizational psychology : a book of readings , 1979 .

[21]  J. Habermas,et al.  The theory of communicative action. Volume 2, Lifeworld andsystem : a critique of functionalist reason , 1989 .

[22]  R. N. Maddison Information system methodologies , 1983 .

[23]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Mapping situations within a system development project , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Jørgen P. Bansler,et al.  The nature of software work. Systems development as labour process , 1991 .

[25]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review , 1983 .

[26]  Ojelanki Kayana Ngwenyama,et al.  Fundamental issues of knowledge acquisition: toward a human action perspective of knowledge systems , 1988 .

[27]  Eleanor Herasimchuk Wynn,et al.  Office conversation as an information medium , 1979 .

[28]  A. Mowshowitz The conquest of will: Information processing in human affairs , 1976 .

[29]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[30]  Andrzej Rapaczyński,et al.  The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. , 1981 .

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Action based model of information system , 1986, Inf. Syst..

[32]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Problem solving for effective systems analysis: an experimental exploration , 1983, CACM.

[33]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[34]  M. Sachs Objective Knowledge , 1974 .

[35]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[36]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[37]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen Information society : for richer, for poorer : selected papers from a conference held at the Selsdon Park Hotel, London, 25-29 January, 1982 , 1982 .

[38]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A speech-act-based office modeling approach , 1988, TOIS.

[39]  R. Howard UTOPIA : Where Workers Craft New Technology : Technology Review , 1987 .

[40]  T. Mccarthy,et al.  The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas , 1978 .