The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes.

This article explores the linkages between strategies for managing different types of conflict and group performance and satisfaction. Results from a qualitative study of 57 autonomous teams suggest that groups that improve or maintain top performance over time share 3 conflict resolution tendencies: (a) focusing on the content of interpersonal interactions rather than delivery style, (b) explicitly discussing reasons behind any decisions reached in accepting and distributing work assignments, and (c) assigning work to members who have the relevant task expertise rather than assigning by other common means such as volunteering, default, or convenience. The authors' results also suggest that teams that are successful over time are likely to be both proactive in anticipating the need for conflict resolution and pluralistic in developing conflict resolution strategies that apply to all group members.

[1]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[2]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[3]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[4]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[5]  Thomas L. Ruble,et al.  Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. , 1976 .

[6]  M. Sashkin,et al.  Thomas G. Cummings and Walter H. Griggs. Worker Reactions to Autonomous Work Groups. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 1976-77,7(4), 87-100 , 1977 .

[7]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[8]  C. Argyris.  Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational , 1982 .

[9]  W. Pasmore,et al.  Sociotechnical Systems: A North American Reflection on Empirical Studies of the Seventies , 1982 .

[10]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[11]  R. Guzzo.  Improving group decision making in organizations : approaches from theory and research , 1982 .

[12]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[13]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[14]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[15]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[16]  C. Argyris.  Strategy, change, and defensive routines , 1985 .

[17]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[18]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[19]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[20]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[21]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Conflict and negotiation. , 1987 .

[22]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[23]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Productivity in Organizations: New Perspectives from Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1988 .

[24]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[25]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Groups and Productivity; Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams , 1988 .

[26]  Members of underrepresented groups: Reviewers for journal manuscripts wanted , 1989 .

[27]  L. Pondy.  Reflections on Organizational Conflict , 1989 .

[28]  Rafik I. Beekun,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Sociotechnical Interventions: Antidote or Fad? , 1989 .

[29]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership , 1990 .

[30]  David G. Mathiasen.  Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[31]  John G. Geer,et al.  DO OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS MEASURE “SALIENT” ISSUES? , 1991 .

[32]  R. Edelmann.  Interpersonal conflicts at work , 1991 .

[33]  John Cordery,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Autonomous Group Working: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1991 .

[34]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[35]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[36]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[37]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural Justice and Culture , 1992 .

[38]  C. Morrill,et al.  Organizational Conflict Management as Disputing Process The Problem of Social Escalation , 1992 .

[39]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. , 1992 .

[40]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[41]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[42]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[43]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective , 1995 .

[44]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[45]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[46]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. , 1995 .

[47]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The structuration of group decisions. , 1996 .

[48]  Allen I. Kraut,et al.  Organizational surveys : tools for assessment and change , 1996 .

[49]  K. Jehn,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND TASK PERFORMANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF MEDIATING PROCESSES IN FRIENDSHIP AND ACQUAINTANCE GROUPS. , 1996 .

[50]  K. W. Carsten,et al.  Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. , 1997 .

[51]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .

[52]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  A directive leadership style in group decision making can be both virtue and vice: Evidence from elite and experimental groups. , 1997 .

[53]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[54]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[55]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[56]  Moorhead,et al.  The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[57]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Breaking the Bonds of Reciprocity in Negotiations , 1998 .

[58]  Dina L. Denham,et al.  Disputant Reactions to Managerial Conflict Resolution Tactics , 1999, Group & Organization Management.

[59]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Approach to Content Validation , 1999 .

[60]  M. Engle.  Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[61]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[62]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[63]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[64]  Kimberly D. Elsbach,et al.  Ethnography and Experiment in Social Psychological Theory Building: Tactics for Integrating Qualitative Field Data with Quantitative Lab Data , 2000 .

[65]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[66]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions. , 2000 .

[67]  Timothy Kuhn,et al.  Do Conflict Management Styles Affect Group Decision Making? Evidence From a Longitudinal Field Study , 2000 .

[68]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[69]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[70]  Jeffrey B. Vancouver,et al.  Self-Regulation in Organizational Settings: A Tale of Two Paradigms , 2000 .

[71]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[72]  C. Tinsley,et al.  How negotiators get to yes: predicting the constellation of strategies used across cultures to negotiate conflict. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[74]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[75]  Alice Tomic,et al.  Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions across Cultural Boundaries , 2002 .

[76]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict , 2002 .

[77]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept Mapping as an Alternative Approach for the Analysis of Open-Ended Survey Responses , 2002 .

[78]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[79]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China , 2003 .

[80]  Kristin Behfar,et al.  The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[81]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[82]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Time, Change, and Development , 2004 .

[84]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The measurement of interrater agreement , 2004 .

[85]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[86]  D. Loyd,et al.  Classroom research: Bridging the ivory divide , 2005 .

[87]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[88]  Dana Yagil,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Conflict Management: The Case of Work Teams , 2005 .

[89]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The Influence of Team Knowledge and Formal Plans on Episodic Team Process-Performance Relationships , 2006 .

[90]  C. Dreu.  When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams , 2006 .

[91]  C. Lance,et al.  The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria , 2006 .

[92]  Roland Castellanos.  A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .