Different magnitude representations in left and right hemisphere: Evidence from the visual half field technique

The differences between left and right hemispheric magnitude representations were investigated in two lateralised priming experiments using single-digit (Experiment 1) and two-digit numbers (Experiment 2). Based on recent brain-imaging and TMS studies, some authors have argued that the magnitude representation in the left hemisphere (LH) is more precise than the one in the right hemisphere (RH). In two experiments a prime number preceded a target number that had to be classified as smaller or larger than a fixed standard. In order to reveal hemispheric differences in magnitude representation, the priming distance effect, i.e., faster responses to targets preceded by numerically closer primes, was analysed in both visual half fields (VHF). Using single-digit numbers no hemispheric differences were found for the priming distance effect, supporting an equally precise magnitude representation in both hemispheres. However, the experiment using two-digit numbers revealed a significantly steeper priming curve when targets were presented in the left visual field (LVF) compared to targets presented in the RVF. These results suggest a less precise magnitude representation in the RH, due to a larger overlap of magnitude representations.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic priming in number naming , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Combs,et al.  Inhibition of Fatal Anaphylaxis in Mice inoculated with a Virus-induced Leukaemic Tumour Extract , 1967, Nature.

[4]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Numerical processing in the two hemispheres: Studies of a split-brain patient , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[7]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[8]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral networks for number processing: Evidence from a case of posterior callosal lesion , 1996 .

[10]  Wim Fias,et al.  Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities , 2007, Cognition.

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[15]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[20]  T. Verguts,et al.  Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Neural Correlates of Simple and Complex Mental Calculation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Bilateral field interactions and hemispheric asymmetry in number comparison , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.

[24]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[25]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric stroop-like interference in number comparison: evidence for strong interhemispheric integration of semantic number information. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[26]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Does the Parietal Cortex Distinguish between “10,” “Ten,” and Ten Dots? , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Event-related fMRI analysis of the cerebral circuit for number comparison. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[30]  Michael Andres,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of number comparison. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[32]  B. Reynvoet,et al.  Hemispheric differences between left and right number representations: effects of conscious and unconscious priming , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[36]  M. Thioux,et al.  Neuroanatomical Substrates of Arabic Number Processing, Numerical Comparison, and Simple Addition: A PET Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.