Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses in women younger and older than 40 years of age. METHODS All women who had FNA biopsy with subsequent tissue biopsy were included. The cytologic diagnoses were classified into three groups: malignant, suspicious, or benign. Histopathologic correlation was based on either a needle core biopsy, an excisional biopsy, or a mastectomy specimen. RESULTS A total of 1,158 fine-needle aspirations performed between 1982 and 2000, on women being evaluated for a clinically palpable breast mass were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of 231 patients aged 40 years and younger, and group II consisted of 927 patients aged 41 years and older. In group I there were 117 (51%) malignant FNA diagnoses, and only 1 (1%) false-positive case, subsequently diagnosed on histopathologic material as an atypical papillomatosis. There were 20 (9%) cases diagnosed as suspicious on FNA. On histopathology 10 were malignant, and 10 were benign. Of the 91 (39%) cases interpreted as benign, only 1 (1%) was a false negative. In group II, which comprised 927 patients, there were 693 (74%) malignant FNA diagnoses, and 3 (less than 1%) false-positive cases, which on follow-up histopathologic examination revealed 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias and 1 atypical papilloma. There were 90 (10%) cases diagnosed as suspicious on FNA. On histopathology, 68 were malignant and 22 were benign. Of the 131 (14%) lesions interpreted as benign, there were 18 false-negative cases (14%), which included 17 infiltrating carcinomas and 1 ductal carcinoma in-situ. Twelve (1%) of the cases were inadequate for the study. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were remarkably high and comparable in both groups: group I had 99% sensitivity, 99% positive predictive value, 99% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value; and group II had 98% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 99% positive predictive value, and 86% negative predictive value. The overall rate of false-positive (less than 1%) and false-negative cases (9%) is comparable with published literature. Suspicious cases should be further evaluated, as our study revealed more than 50% to be malignant. The incidence of malignancy in patients presenting with a clinically palpable breast mass with follow-up biopsy was 51% in patients aged 40 years and younger and 74% in patients aged 41 years and older. Fine-needle aspiration is an excellent diagnostic tool in assessing clinically palpable breast masses.

[1]  P. Gattuso,et al.  Fine-needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast lesions with histopathologic correlation. , 1997, Surgery.

[2]  L. V. van Bogaert,et al.  Reliability of the cyto-radio-clinical triplet in breast pathology diagnosis. , 1977, Acta Cytologica.

[3]  T. Smith,et al.  Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy. , 1985, American journal of surgery.

[4]  Z Kaufman,et al.  Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: Combined physical examination, mammography, and fine‐needle aspiration , 1994, Journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  K. Wakasa,et al.  Diagnostic Potential and Pitfalls of Ultrasound-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Breast Lesions , 1998, Surgery Today.

[6]  G. Kreuzer,et al.  Aspiration biopsy cytology, mammography and clinical exploration: a modern set up in diagnosis of tumors of the breast. , 1976, Acta cytologica.

[7]  A. Zajdela,et al.  The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer: Experience at the fondation curie , 1975, Cancer.

[8]  J. Spiliotis,et al.  Comparison of fine needle aspiration and Tru-Cut biopsy of palpable mammary lesions. , 1996, Cancer detection and prevention.

[9]  W. Pories,et al.  Cost‐Effectiveness of Fine Needle Biopsy of the Breast , 1986, Annals of surgery.

[10]  P. J. Howanitz,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of performance in breast fine-needle aspiration cytology. A Q-probe quality indicator study. , 1991, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  R. O’Toole,et al.  Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4,265 cases from the literature. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[12]  B. Glasgow,et al.  Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses. , 1989, Pathology annual.

[13]  J. Jensen,et al.  Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography, and fine‐needle puncture (“triple‐test”) in breast tumors: A prospective study , 1987, Cancer.

[14]  T. Powles,et al.  Clinical examination, xeromammography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast tumours. , 1978, British medical journal.

[15]  F. Fulciniti,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses. A critical analysis of 1956 cases in 8 years (1976–1984) , 1988 .

[16]  H. Martin,et al.  BIOPSY BY NEEDLE PUNCTURE AND ASPIRATION. , 1930 .

[17]  T. Kline,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration of the breast: Diagnoses and pitfalls. A review of 3545 cases , 1979, Cancer.

[18]  H. Wanebo,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology in lieu of open biopsy in management of primary breast cancer. , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[19]  F. Bonetti,et al.  Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration in the management of breast lesions: Comparison of specificity and sensitivity with clinical examination, mammography, echography, and thermography in 249 patients , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[20]  C. Scopa,et al.  Sources of diagnostic discrepancies in fine‐ needle aspiration of the breast , 1991, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[21]  J. K. Martin,et al.  Fine-needle aspiration of the breast. , 1986, Mayo Clinic proceedings.