Bacterial Hash Function Using DNA-Based XOR Logic Reveals Unexpected Behavior of the LuxR Promoter

Introduction: Hash functions are computer algorithms that protect information and secure transactions. In response to the NIST`s "International Call for Hash Function", we developed a biological hash function using the computing capabilities of bacteria. We designed a DNA-based XOR logic gate that allows bacterial colonies arranged in a series on an agar plate to perform hash function calculations. Results and Discussion: In order to provide each colony with adequate time to process inputs and perform XOR logic, we designed and successfully demonstrated a system for time-delayed bacterial growth. Our system is based on the diffusion of -lactamase, resulting in destruction of ampicillin. Our DNA-based XOR logic gate design is based on the op-position of two promoters. Our results showed that and functioned as expected individually, but did not behave as expected in the XOR construct. Our data showed that, contrary to literature reports, the promoter is bidirectional. In the absence of the 3OC6 inducer, the LuxR activator can bind to the promoter and induce backwards transcription. Conclusion and Prospects: Our system of time delayed bacterial growth allows for the successive processing of a bacterial hash function, and is expected to have utility in other synthetic biology applications. While testing our DNA-based XOR logic gate, we uncovered a novel function of . In the absence of autoinducer 3OC6, LuxR binds to and activates backwards transcription. This result advances basic research and has important implications for the widespread use of the promoter.

[1]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Quantifying the Integration of Quorum-Sensing Signals with Single-Cell Resolution , 2009, PLoS biology.

[2]  Dana Mackenzie Cryptologists Cook Up Some Hash for New 'Bake-Off' , 2008, Science.

[3]  Laurie J. Heyer,et al.  Engineering bacteria to solve the Burnt Pancake Problem , 2008, Journal of biological engineering.

[4]  Fernando Arroyo,et al.  Biocircuit design through engineering bacterial logic gates , 2011, Natural Computing.

[5]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Release of periplasmic enzymes and other physiological effects of β‐lactamase overproduction in Escherichia coli , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Synergistic binding of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR transcriptional activator domain and RNA polymerase to the lux promoter region , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Inouye,et al.  Transcription Regulation of ompF and ompC by a Single Transcription Factor, OmpR* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Reversible Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Binding to Purified Vibrio fischeri LuxR Protein , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Engineered gene circuits , 2002, Nature.

[10]  J. Fraser Stoddart,et al.  Logic Operations at the Molecular Level. An XOR Gate Based on a Molecular Machine , 1997 .

[11]  B. Ahmer Cell‐to‐cell signalling in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  Darko Stefanovic,et al.  Deoxyribozyme-based logic gates. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Jacques Monod,et al.  On the Regulation of Gene Activity , 1961 .

[14]  Thomas F. Knight,et al.  Idempotent Vector Design for Standard Assembly of Biobricks , 2003 .

[15]  P. Dunlap,et al.  Quorum regulation of luminescence in Vibrio fischeri. , 1999, Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology.

[16]  A. P. de Silva,et al.  Molecular-scale logic gates. , 2004, Chemistry.

[17]  T. Baldwin,et al.  Positive autoregulation of the Vibrio fischeri luxR gene. LuxR and autoinducer activate cAMP-catabolite gene activator protein complex-independent and -dependent luxR transcription. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  M. Inouye,et al.  Phosphorylation of OmpR by the osmosensor EnvZ modulates expression of the ompF and ompC genes in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  H. Riezman,et al.  Transcription and translation initiation frequencies of the Escherichia coli lac operon. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  T. Balganesh,et al.  Novel Scintillation Proximity Assay for Measuring Membrane-Associated Steps of Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis inEscherichia coli , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  W. Nasser,et al.  New insights into the regulatory mechanisms of the LuxR family of quorum sensing regulators , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[22]  B. Ahmer,et al.  E. coli K-12 and EHEC Genes Regulated by SdiA , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  K. Jung,et al.  K+ Stimulates Specifically the Autokinase Activity of Purified and Reconstituted EnvZ of Escherichia coli * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Conversion of the Vibrio fischeriTranscriptional Activator, LuxR, to a Repressor , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  Martin Fussenegger,et al.  BioLogic gates enable logical transcription control in mammalian cells , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Robust multicellular computing using genetically encoded NOR gates and chemical ‘wires’ , 2011, Nature.

[27]  M. Inouye,et al.  EnvZ-OmpR Interaction and Osmoregulation in Escherichia coli * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineered bacteria. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  A Malcolm Campbell,et al.  Solving a Hamiltonian Path Problem with a bacterial computer , 2009, Journal of biological engineering.

[30]  Herbert M Sauro,et al.  Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits , 2010, Journal of biological engineering.