Principles of ultrasound elastography

Many manufacturers of ultrasound systems offer elastography capabilities. Though the research literature describes techniques involving external actuators, commercial systems have preferred to adopt techniques that may be used with a single transducer. Techniques may be divided into those which measure strain and those which measure shear wave velocity. Strain elastography involves deformation of the tissue followed by imaging of the degree of compression or extension of the tissue. Strain elastography does not estimate tissue stiffness; however, the strain ratio may be used as a surrogate index of stiffness. Shear wave elastography provides true quantitative information on elastic modulus. This involves induction of shear waves, estimation of shear wave velocity c s and conversion to elastic modulus E using the equation E = 3ρ c s 2 where ρ is the density. The description of tissues as being purely elastic is simplistic. In practice they may also exhibit time-dependent viscous behaviour. Recent literature describe methods that have been developed for estimation of the viscoelastic behaviour from the change in strain with time or by estimation of the shear wave dispersion, a technique known as ‘shear wave spectroscopy’. These methods may become commercially available in the medium term, offering a new quantity (tissue viscosity) for diagnostic use.

[1]  M. Fink,et al.  Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1-D transient elastography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  A. P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Physical chemistry of the ultrasound-tissue interaction. , 2005 .

[3]  K. Nightingale,et al.  Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  G. Trahey,et al.  On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Shear Wave Spectroscopy for In Vivo Quantification of Human Soft Tissues Visco-Elasticity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  G. Trahey,et al.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  Review Paper: Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Makoto Yamakawa,et al.  Strain Estimation Using the Extended Combined Autocorrelation Method , 2001 .

[12]  D. Rubens,et al.  Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Viscoelastic Imaging of Breast Tumor Microenvironment With Ultrasound , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[14]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Quantifying elasticity and viscosity from measurement of shear wave speed dispersion. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  T. Abraham,et al.  Role of tissue Doppler and strain echocardiography in current clinical practice. , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Michael Burcher,et al.  A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  M. Fink,et al.  Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  G R Sutherland,et al.  Verification of cardiac doppler tissue images using grey-scale M-mode images. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  M. Fink,et al.  Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  Jeffrey C. Bamber,et al.  Attenuation and absorption. , 2005 .

[24]  Gregg Trahey,et al.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Michael F Insana,et al.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[26]  F. Duck Physical properties of tissue , 1990 .

[27]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method , 2002, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[28]  M. Ziol,et al.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  J. Humphrey Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues , 2003 .

[30]  Armen Sarvazyan,et al.  Elastic Properties of Soft Tissue , 2001 .

[31]  M F Insana,et al.  Viscoelasticity imaging using ultrasound: parameters and error analysis. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .