A Universal Digital Image Steganalysis Method Based on Sparse Representation

With the development of modern steganography technologies, steganalysis has been a new research topic in the field of information security. Since JPEG images have been widely used in our daily life, the steganalysis for JPEG images becomes very important and significant. This paper propose a new steganalysis method based on sparse representation, intending to overcome the shortcomings of traditional classifiers in the field of universal steganalysis for JPEG images. Experimental results show that, comparing with the universal steganalysis method for JPEG stego images based on SVM, our method improves detection accuracy to some extent, and can avoid "over-fitting" problem in the process of classification. Experimental results also prove that our method is more robust than SVM when the detection images meet with Gaussian noises or Salt-Pepper noise.

[1]  Joseph F. Murray,et al.  An improved FOCUSS-based learning algorithm for solving sparse linear inverse problems , 2001, Conference Record of Thirty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat.No.01CH37256).

[2]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  Robust and Efficient Subspace Segmentation via Least Squares Regression , 2012, ECCV.

[3]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Steganalysis of JPEG Images: Breaking the F5 Algorithm , 2002, Information Hiding.

[4]  Tomás Pevný,et al.  Merging Markov and DCT features for multi-class JPEG steganalysis , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Detecting LSB Steganography in Color and Gray-Scale Images , 2001, IEEE Multim..

[7]  Hervé Glotin,et al.  Cooperative Sparse Representation in Two Opposite Directions for Semi-Supervised Image Annotation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Xuezeng Pan,et al.  Feature-Based Steganalysis for JPEG Images , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Digital Image Processing.

[9]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  J. Fridrich,et al.  Attacking the OutGuess , 2002 .

[11]  Ashraf M. Emam,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Different Universal Steganalysis Techniques in JPG Files , 2012 .

[12]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.