Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success

Abstract Competition is fierce today. Businesses are feeling extreme pressure to innovate and do so quickly. If they take too long in bringing a product to market or make a mistake along the way, they can be preempted by a faster moving competitor. One technique gaining popularity to help companies compete is establishing learning teams—teams that create and use knowledge rapidly and effectively. But how do teams learn? By studying the learning practices of 95 new product teams, we have uncovered several factors that improve a new product team’s ability to learn, innovate faster, and be more successful. These factors include thoroughly reviewing project information, having stable project goals, and following a rigorous new product development process.

[1]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Models Of Human Memory , 1970 .

[4]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[5]  James T. Simpson,et al.  Effects of Organizational Learning and Information-Processing Behaviors on New Product Success , 1997 .

[6]  Gary S. Lynn Organizational team learning for really new product development , 1997 .

[7]  R. Cooper Third‐Generation New Product Processes , 1994 .

[8]  M. Rosenau Faster New Product Development , 1988 .

[9]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Market oriented isn't enough : build a learning organization : commentary , 1994 .

[10]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE PAST: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING UNDER AMBIGUITY* , 1975 .

[11]  L. Dwyer,et al.  New product process activities and project outcomes , 1991 .

[12]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  A process model for industrial new product development , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Kenneth A. Kiewra Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative , 1985 .

[14]  R. Osborn,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments. , 1982 .

[15]  H. Thamhain Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success , 1990 .

[16]  R. Premus,et al.  Location of high technology firms and regional economic development : a staff study , 1982 .

[17]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[18]  C. Wesley,et al.  A Review and A Model. , 1967 .

[19]  Bela Gold,et al.  Approaches to accelerating product and process development , 1987 .

[20]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[21]  Michael T. Anthony,et al.  From experience: Balancing the product development process: Achieving product and cycle-time excellence in high-technology industries , 1992 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. , 1988 .

[23]  D. Eden,et al.  Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .

[24]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Contemporary Challenges in the Study of Organizations , 1986 .

[25]  N. Karagozoglu,et al.  Time‐Based Management of the New Product Development Process , 1993 .

[26]  Christopher Meyer,et al.  Sex Steps To Becoming a Fast-Cycle-Time Competitor , 1993 .

[27]  L Smith,et al.  What do we owe to the elderly? , 1989, Fortune.

[28]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Learning in new technology development teams , 1989 .

[29]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[30]  George S. Day,et al.  Learning about markets , 1991 .

[31]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[32]  Gary S. Lynn,et al.  New Product Team Learning: Developing and Profiting from Your Knowledge Capital , 1998 .

[33]  Nelson F. DuBois,et al.  Note-taking functions and techniques. , 1991 .

[34]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[35]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[36]  Ursula Weisenfeld,et al.  Making Trade‐Offs in the New Product Development Process: A German/US Comparison , 1992 .

[37]  R. Cordero Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[38]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[39]  Linda Rochford,et al.  How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process , 1992 .

[40]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Firm size and product innovation , 1987 .

[41]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[42]  W. Souder,et al.  THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: A REVIEW AND A MODEL , 1987 .

[43]  Edgar A. Pessemier,et al.  The Dimensions of New Product Planning , 1973 .

[44]  K. Weick The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[45]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[46]  M. Harris,et al.  Effect of Note Taking and Review on Recall. , 1973 .

[47]  Daryl McKee,et al.  An organizational learning approach to product innovation , 1992 .

[48]  E. Nijssen,et al.  Accelerating New Product Development: A Preliminary Empirical Test of a Hierarchy of Implementation , 1995 .

[49]  Francis J. Di Vesta,et al.  Listening and Note Taking: II. Immediate and Delayed Recall as Functions of Variations in Thematic Continuity, Note Taking, and Length of Listening-Review Intervals. , 1973 .

[50]  Robert Z. Lawrence Can America Compete , 1984 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[52]  E. Feigenbaum 13 – Information Processing and Memory , 1970 .

[53]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[54]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process , 1986 .

[55]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[56]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[57]  C. Gersick MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[58]  P. Shrivastava A TYPOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[59]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[60]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Review of the Literature with Implications for HRD Professionals. , 1992 .

[61]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[62]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[63]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[64]  B. Hedberg How Organizations Learn and Unlearn , 1981 .

[65]  James M. Sinkula Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[66]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[67]  Curtis L Ventriss,et al.  Organizational Learning and Public Policy: Towards a Substantive Perspective , 1988 .

[68]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Faster new product development: Investigating the effects of technology and characteristics of the project leader and team , 1993 .

[69]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[70]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[71]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .