Perspectives of gene editing for cattle farming in tropical and subtropical regions

Abstract Cattle productivity in tropical and subtropical regions can be severely affected by the environment. Reproductive performance, milk and meat production are compromised by the heat stress imposed by the elevated temperature and humidity. The resulting low productivity contributes to reduce the farmer’s income and to increase the methane emissions per unit of animal protein produced and the pressure on land usage. The introduction of highly productive European cattle breeds as well as crossbreeding with local breeds have been adopted as strategies to increase productivity but the positive effects have been limited by the low adaptation of European animals to hot climates and by the reduction of the heterosis effect in the following generations. Gene editing tools allow precise modifications in the animal genome and can be an ally to the cattle industry in tropical and subtropical regions. Alleles associated with production or heat tolerance can be shifted between breeds without the need of crossbreeding. Alongside assisted reproductive biotechnologies and genome selection, gene editing can accelerate the genetic gain of indigenous breeds such as zebu cattle. This review focuses on some of the potential applications of gene editing for cattle farming in tropical and subtropical regions, bringing aspects related to heat stress, milk yield, bull reproduction and methane emissions.

[1]  A. Poddar,et al.  Enabling Trade in Gene-Edited Produce in Asia and Australasia: The Developing Regulatory Landscape and Future Perspectives , 2022, Plants.

[2]  Youmin Zhu Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 , 2022, BioMed research international.

[3]  A. Denicol,et al.  Physiological responses of Holstein calves and heifers carrying the SLICK1 allele to heat stress in California and Florida dairy farms. , 2022, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  M. Mercadante,et al.  Effect of Nellore (Bos indicus) donor age on in vitro embryo production and pregnancy rate. , 2022, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[5]  Alison L. Van Eenennaam,et al.  Synergistic power of genomic selection, assisted reproductive technologies, and gene editing to drive genetic improvement of cattle , 2022, CABI Agriculture and Bioscience.

[6]  R. M. Ferreira,et al.  Impact of oocyte donor age and breed on in vitro embryo production in cattle, and relationship of dairy and beef embryo recipients on pregnancy and the subsequent performance of offspring: A review. , 2021, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[7]  Matthew S. McNeill,et al.  Optimized design parameters for CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a homology-directed repair , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Yiping Qi,et al.  Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors , 2021, Nature Plants.

[9]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  Heat stress response in slick vs normal-haired Criollo Limonero heifers in a tropical environment , 2021, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[10]  S. R. Mishra,et al.  Behavioural, physiological, neuro-endocrine and molecular responses of cattle against heat stress: an updated review , 2021, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[11]  D. Dimov,et al.  Influence of Heat Stress and Physiological Indicators Related to It on Health Lipid Indices in Milk of Holstein-Friesian Cows. , 2021, Journal of oleo science.

[12]  Leonardo Lelis de Macedo Costa,et al.  An updated review on cattle thermoregulation: physiological responses, biophysical mechanisms, and heat stress alleviation pathways , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  T. Davison,et al.  Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[14]  T. Yin,et al.  Climate sensitivity of milk production traits and milk fatty acids in genotyped Holstein dairy cows. , 2021, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  K. Domenech-Pérez,et al.  Light sensors assess solar radiation vs. shade exposure of slick- and wild-type Puerto Rican Holstein cows , 2021, The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico.

[16]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  Functional Prediction and Assignment of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 Operome Using a Combined Bioinformatics Approach , 2020, Frontiers in Genetics.

[17]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  Three novel nonsense mutations of prolactin receptor found in heat-tolerant Bos taurus breeds of the Caribbean Basin. , 2020, Animal genetics.

[18]  Alison L. Van Eenennaam,et al.  Genetic Engineering of Livestock: The Opportunity Cost of Regulatory Delay. , 2020, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[19]  Xueli Zhang,et al.  CRISPR-based metabolic pathway engineering. , 2020, Metabolic engineering.

[20]  Y. Liu,et al.  Donor-derived spermatogenesis following stem cell transplantation in sterile NANOS2 knockout males , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Edyta Wojtas,et al.  Impact of SNPs in ACACA, SCD1, and DGAT1 Genes on Fatty Acid Profile in Bovine Milk with Regard to Lactation Phases , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[22]  P. Hansen Prospects for gene introgression or gene editing as a strategy for reduction of the impact of heat stress on production and reproduction in cattle. , 2020, Theriogenology.

[23]  J. Morrell Heat stress and bull fertility. , 2020, Theriogenology.

[24]  P. Lonergan,et al.  RS‐1 enhances CRISPR‐mediated targeted knock‐in in bovine embryos , 2020, Molecular reproduction and development.

[25]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  THE PROMISE AND CHALLENGE OF THERAPEUTIC GENOME EDITING , 2020, Nature.

[26]  Yingjun Li,et al.  Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System-Based Genome Editing and Antimicrobials: Review and Prospects , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[27]  Kyoungmi Kim,et al.  Evolution of CRISPR towards accurate and efficient mammal genome engineering , 2019, BMB reports.

[28]  Saiful Anwar,et al.  Genetic Polymorphism of SCD1 Gene of Holstein-Friesian Cows in Indonesia , 2019, Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner.

[29]  H. Tian,et al.  Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature , 2019, Nature Communications.

[30]  J. Oatley,et al.  Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation: Insights and Outlook for Domestic Animals. , 2019, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[31]  Dekun Chen,et al.  Methodologies for Improving HDR Efficiency , 2019, Front. Genet..

[32]  Flaviana Gottardo,et al.  Impact of heat stress on milk and meat production , 2018, Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture.

[33]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon. , 2018, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[34]  A. El-Nahas Variation in the Genetic Effects of ABCG2, Growth Hormone and Growth Hormone Receptor Gene Polymorphisms on Milk Production Traits in Egyptian Native, Holstein and Hybrid Cattle Populations , 2018, Pakistan Veterinary Journal.

[35]  J. Miller,et al.  Role of DGAT enzymes in triacylglycerol metabolism. , 2018, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[36]  E. Ibeagha-Awemu,et al.  Milk fatty acid variability and association with polymorphisms in SCD1 and DGAT1 genes in White Fulani and Borgou cattle breeds , 2018, Molecular Biology Reports.

[37]  F. Tiezzi,et al.  Short communication: Association analysis of diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) mutation on chromosome 14 for milk yield and composition traits, somatic cell score, and coagulation properties in Holstein bulls. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  A. Van Soom,et al.  Heat stress responses in spermatozoa: Mechanisms and consequences for cattle fertility. , 2018, Theriogenology.

[39]  Steven G. Schroeder,et al.  Convergent Evolution of Slick Coat in Cattle through Truncation Mutations in the Prolactin Receptor , 2018, Front. Genet..

[40]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics , 2017 .

[41]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Genome Editing: Past, Present, and Future
 , 2017, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[42]  Zhenfang Wu,et al.  Small molecules enhance CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed genome editing in primary cells , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[43]  B. Cocks,et al.  Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle Alters Lipid Composition of Milk , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[44]  W. Metcalf,et al.  Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Ki-Eun Park,et al.  Generation of germline ablated male pigs by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the NANOS2 gene , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[46]  J. Schiemann,et al.  Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts , 2016, Plant Cell Reports.

[47]  Marc Tessier-Lavigne,et al.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9 , 2016, Nature.

[48]  J. Hickey,et al.  Promotion of alleles by genome editing in livestock breeding programmes. , 2016, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[49]  L. B. Larsen,et al.  Effects of the diacylglycerol o-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism on fatty acid, protein, and mineral composition of dairy cattle milk. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[50]  Y. E. Chen,et al.  RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency , 2016, Nature Communications.

[51]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Harnessing Type I and Type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  M. Lema,et al.  Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina. , 2015, GM crops & food.

[53]  P. B. Pope,et al.  Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[54]  H. Bovenhuis,et al.  Effects of the DGAT1 polymorphism on test-day milk production traits throughout lactation. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[55]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[56]  S. Boeren,et al.  Effect of the DGAT1 K232A genotype of dairy cows on the milk metabolome and proteome. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[57]  A. Tabaran,et al.  Influence of DGAT1 K232A Polymorphism on Milk Fat Percentage and Fatty Acid Profiles in Romanian Holstein Cattle , 2015, Animal biotechnology.

[58]  H. Ploegh,et al.  Inhibition of non-homologous end joining increases the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise [TM: inserted] genome editing , 2016 .

[59]  D. de Koning,et al.  Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs , 2015, Front. Genet..

[60]  H. Jones Future of breeding by genome editing is in the hands of regulators. , 2015, GM crops & food.

[61]  S. Jeyakumar,et al.  Genetic variability of bovine GHR, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 genes in Indian cattle and buffalo , 2015 .

[62]  R. Snell,et al.  Functionally reciprocal mutations of the prolactin signalling pathway define hairy and slick cattle , 2014, Nature Communications.

[63]  J. Doudna,et al.  The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 , 2014, Science.

[64]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  The SLICK hair locus derived from Senepol cattle confers thermotolerance to intensively managed lactating Holstein cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[65]  H. Udo,et al.  Development of livestock production in the tropics: farm and farmers' perspectives. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[66]  Dongwan D. Kang,et al.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome , 2014, Genome research.

[67]  H. Kim,et al.  A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[68]  W. Park,et al.  Unsaturated fatty acids, desaturases, and human health. , 2014, Journal of medicinal food.

[69]  V. Singh,et al.  Breeding strategies for tick resistance in tropical cattle: a sustainable approach for tick control , 2015, Journal of Parasitic Diseases.

[70]  C. Barbas,et al.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[71]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Comparison between stearoyl-CoA desaturase expression in milk somatic cells and in mammary tissue of lactating dairy cows. , 2013, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[72]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[73]  L. Symington,et al.  Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. , 2011, Annual review of genetics.

[74]  M. Reissmann,et al.  The F279Y polymorphism of the GHR gene and its relation to milk production and somatic cell score in German Holstein dairy cattle , 2011, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[75]  J. Ferry Fundamentals of methanogenic pathways that are key to the biomethanation of complex biomass. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[76]  H. Bovenhuis,et al.  Genome-wide association of milk fatty acids in Dutch dairy cattle , 2011, BMC Genetics.

[77]  A. Landaeta-Hernández,et al.  Variability of hair coat and skin traits as related to adaptation in Criollo Limonero cattle , 2011, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[78]  S. Moore,et al.  The effect of Ala293Val single nucleotide polymorphism in the stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene on conjugated linoleic acid concentration in milk fat of dairy cows , 2010 .

[79]  R. DeFries,et al.  Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  H. Roche,et al.  Conjugated linoleic acid and inflammatory cell signalling. , 2010, Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids.

[81]  T. Xie,et al.  NANOS: a germline stem cell's Guardian Angel. , 2010, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[82]  William J. Kelly,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the Rumen Methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Reveals New Possibilities for Controlling Ruminant Methane Emissions , 2010, PloS one.

[83]  J. Jia,et al.  Effects of DGAT1 and GHR on milk yield and milk composition in the Chinese dairy population. , 2009, Animal genetics.

[84]  M. Meuwissen,et al.  Effects of milk fat composition, DGAT1, and SCD1 on fertility traits in Dutch Holstein cattle. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[85]  Yumiko Saga,et al.  The RNA-Binding Protein NANOS2 Is Required to Maintain Murine Spermatogonial Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[86]  J. Ntambi,et al.  Biochemical and physiological function of stearoyl-CoA desaturase. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[87]  P. Hansen,et al.  Differences in thermoregulatory ability between slick-haired and wild-type lactating Holstein cows in response to acute heat stress. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[88]  G Banos,et al.  Impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in leptin, leptin receptor, growth hormone receptor, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) gene loci on milk production, feed, and body energy traits of UK dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[89]  H. Bovenhuis,et al.  Milk fatty acid unsaturation: genetic parameters and effects of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and acyl CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1). , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[90]  G. Pielberg,et al.  Frequency and effect of the bovine acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism in Swedish dairy cattle. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[91]  S. Chessa,et al.  Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene polymorphism and milk fatty acid composition in Italian Holsteins. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[92]  E. Ibeagha-Awemu,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the open reading frame of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene and resulting genetic variants in Canadian Holstein and Jersey cows , 2007, DNA sequence : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping.

[93]  G. Fernandes,et al.  Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease. , 2006, The Journal of nutritional biochemistry.

[94]  M. Carvalho,et al.  DGAT1 K232A polymorphism in Brazilian cattle breeds. , 2006, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[95]  M. Georges,et al.  The Role of the Bovine Growth Hormone Receptor and Prolactin Receptor Genes in Milk, Fat and Protein Production in Finnish Ayrshire Dairy Cattle , 2006, Genetics.

[96]  K. Olsson,et al.  Endocrinology of milk production. , 2005, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[97]  O. Syrstad Dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics: Choice of crossbreeding strategy , 1996, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[98]  X. Manteca,et al.  Effects of poor forage conditions on the behaviour of grazing ruminants , 1994, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[99]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturases and role in metabolism. , 2004, Progress in lipid research.

[100]  Michel Georges,et al.  Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: a phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. , 2002, Genetics.

[101]  C. Chase,et al.  Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in Bos taurus cattle. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[102]  R. Fries,et al.  Association of a lysine-232/alanine polymorphism in a bovine gene encoding acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) with variation at a quantitative trait locus for milk fat content , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[103]  Michel Georges,et al.  Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[104]  U. Deppenmeier The unique biochemistry of methanogenesis. , 2002, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[105]  S. Shima,et al.  Structure and function of enzymes involved in the methanogenic pathway utilizing carbon dioxide and molecular hydrogen. , 2002, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[106]  D. Bauman,et al.  Bovine somatotropin and lactation: from basic science to commercial application. , 1999, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[107]  Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai,et al.  Homologous recombination and non‐homologous end‐joining pathways of DNA double‐strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[108]  R. Randel,et al.  Heat tolerance in two tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds, Senepol and Romosinuano, compared with Brahman, Angus, and Hereford cattle in Florida. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[109]  D. Johnson,et al.  Methane emissions from cattle. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[110]  J. Ferry Biochemistry of methanogenesis. , 1992, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[111]  O. Syrstad Dairy cattle cross-breeding in the tropics: Performance of secondary cross-bred populations , 1989 .