The interaction between reasoning and decision making: an introduction

Reasoning and decision making are high-level cognitive skills that have been under intensive investigation by psychologists and philosophers, among others, for the last thirty years. But, methods and theories have developed separately in the two fields so that distinct traditions have grown with little to say to one another. The aim of this special issue of Cognition is to encourage and help workers in these two traditions to understand one another’s research and to reflect and enhance some recent signs of “crosstalk” between them. It seemed to us high time to consider the growing interactions between reasoning and decision making for at least three reasons. First, the two abilities are often interwoven in real life, at least according to the common-sense view epitomized in the maxim at the head of this introduction. Second, their study has led to striking parallels in the conclusions that investigators have reached and to the recent signs of crosstalk. Third, the two fields have important lessons for each other. We will explore each of these reasons before we introduce the papers in this special issue. We begin with a sketch of the everyday assumptions that relate reasoning and decision making - a background that we will defend, though it is sometimes disparaged by philosophers as “folk psychology”.

[1]  Jay L. Garfield,et al.  Review: John Macnamara, A Border Dispute. The Place of Logic in Psychology , 1988 .

[2]  John W. Payne,et al.  A Constructive Process View of Decision Making: Multiple Strategies in Judgment and Choice , 1992 .

[3]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[4]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[5]  P. C. Wason,et al.  Dual processes in reasoning? , 1975, Cognition.

[6]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  A New Introduction to Modal Logic , 1998 .

[7]  Mary Henle,et al.  On the Relation Between Logic and Thinking , 1983 .

[8]  Colin Camerer Recent Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory , 1992 .

[9]  M. Braine,et al.  A Theory of If: A Lexical Entry, Reasoning Program, and Pragmatic Principles , 1991 .

[10]  L. Rips Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning. , 1983 .

[11]  P. Churchland Matter and Consciousness , 1984 .

[12]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[13]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision Making: DESCRIPTIVE, NORMATIVE, AND PRESCRIPTIVE INTERACTIONS IN DECISION MAKING , 1988 .

[14]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[15]  Amos Tversky,et al.  ON THE FRAMING OF MEDICAL DECISIONS , 1988 .

[16]  Evert W. Beth,et al.  Mathematical Epistemology And Psychology , 1966 .

[17]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[18]  S. Stich From folk psychology to cognitive science , 1983 .

[19]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[21]  P. Schoemaker The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[22]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[23]  L. Cohen Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  G. E. Hughes,et al.  An introduction to modal logic, 2e éd., 1 vol , 1973 .

[25]  Christopher Cherniak,et al.  Minimal Rationality , 1986, Computational models of cognition and perception.

[26]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. , 1990 .

[27]  Zur Shapira,et al.  Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. , 1990 .

[28]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[29]  W. Edwards Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications , 1992 .

[30]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[31]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .