Experimental assessment of dynamic lateral resistance of railway concrete sleeper

Abstract The single tie (sleeper) push test (STPT) is a common method to evaluate the lateral resistance of a railway track sleeper. This methodology evaluates the lateral resistance phenomenon in a static manner despite the fact that the majority of the exerted loads on a railway track have a dynamic nature. For this reason, a mass–spring–damper numerical model was created to investigate the dynamic lateral interaction between an isolated sleeper and ballast layer in the presence of various lateral impact loads. On the basis of the model outputs, a pendulum loading test device (PLTD) was designed and developed in the laboratory. In this regard, a cylindrical hammer with modifiable mass and triggering angle was installed on a steel frame for imposing lateral impact load on an instrumented concrete sleeper. The graphs of the sleeper–ballast interaction force versus the sleeper lateral displacement were extracted for different masses and triggering angles of the hammer. Considering a same condition for sleeper, the maximum value of this interaction force was called the dynamic lateral resistance (DLR) and static lateral resistance (SLR) respect to the dynamic and static states of lateral loading. Comparing the values of the sleeper DLRs and SLR indicated that unlike the constant SLR of 6.5 kN, the DLR was in the range 2–10.2 kN in the impact load domain of 3–40 kN. However, as a key finding, the average slopes of the DLR and SLR graphs were equivalent in the dynamic and static tests.

[1]  N F Doyle,et al.  RAILWAY TRACK DESIGN: A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE , 1980 .

[2]  L M Le Pen,et al.  Contribution of Base, Crib, and Shoulder Ballast to the Lateral Sliding Resistance of Railway Track: A Geotechnical Perspective , 2011 .

[3]  Morteza Esmaeili,et al.  A numerical investigation on the lateral resistance of frictional sleepers in ballasted railway tracks , 2016 .

[4]  Takahisa Nakamura,et al.  Numerical method for evaluating the lateral resistance of sleepers in ballasted tracks , 2014 .

[5]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  The influence of track modelling options on the simulation of rail vehicle dynamics , 2012 .

[6]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Application of a Computational Tool to Study the Influence of Worn Wheels on Railway Vehicle Dynamics , 2012 .

[7]  Huimin Wu,et al.  8 Railway Vehicle Derailment and Prevention , 2006 .

[8]  Simon Iwnicki,et al.  The integration of cross wind forces into train dynamic calculations , 2008 .

[9]  Elena Kabo,et al.  A numerical study of the lateral ballast resistance in railway tracks , 2006 .

[10]  R. H. Prause,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL MODELS FOR RAILROAD TRACK DYNAMICS , 1975 .

[11]  Andrew Kish,et al.  On the Fundamentals of Track Lateral Resistance , 2011 .

[12]  C. Esveld Modern railway track , 1989 .

[13]  H Ishida,et al.  A NEW CONTINUOUS MEASURING METHOD OF WHEEL/RAIL CONTACT FORCES , 1994 .

[14]  Jabbar Ali Zakeri,et al.  Lateral resistance of railway track with frictional sleepers , 2012 .

[15]  Jianhui Lin,et al.  Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations , 2004 .

[16]  Andrew Kish,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF TRACK MAINTENANCE ON THE LATERAL RESISTANCE OF CONCRETE TIE TRACK , 2007 .

[17]  Piotr Chrostowski,et al.  Tests on lateral resistance in railway tracks during the operation of a tamping machine , 2011 .

[18]  D R Ahlbeck,et al.  TECHNIQUES FOR MEASUREMENT OF WHEEL-RAIL FORCES , 1980 .

[19]  Xinbiao Xiao,et al.  A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system , 2014 .

[20]  William Powrie,et al.  Sleeper End Resistance of Ballasted Railway Tracks , 2014 .

[21]  V. A. Profillidis Railway Engineering , 1995 .