Sensitivity of state‐of‐the‐art and high efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells to metal impurities

For the first time, the sensitivity to impurities of the solar cell conversion efficiency is reported for a state-of-the-art (i.e., 18%) and advanced device architecture (i.e., 23%). The data are based on the experimental results obtained in the CrystalClear project for the state-of-the-art cell process and extrapolated to a device with excellent front and rear surface passivation. Both device structures are not assumed to work in low injection level as several studies assumed before, but real operating conditions are considered. This is a fundamental difference with the past and required for modeling future high efficiency devices. The impurity with highest impact is Ti, followed by Cu, Cr, Ni and Fe, which form together a group two order of magnitude less sensitive than the former. In high efficiency devices, a large reduction of the impurity impact is visible for impurities with large capture cross-section ratio like Fe, which reduces its relative difference in comparison with, for example, Cr, which has a small capture cross-section ratio. In general, advanced devices will be more sensitive to the impurity content than the state-of-the-art cell design. This effect is partly compensated by a reduction of the substrate thickness. The impurity sensitivity as function of the substrate thickness is reported. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Reduced fill factors in multicrystalline silicon solar cells due to injection‐level dependent bulk recombination lifetimes , 2000 .

[2]  A. Istratov,et al.  Experimental evidence for the presence of segregation and relaxation gettering of iron in polycrystalline silicon layers on silicon , 2004 .

[3]  Simona Binetti,et al.  From electronic grade to solar grade silicon: chances and challenges in photovoltaics , 2005 .

[4]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Temperature dependent carrier lifetime studies on Ti-doped multicrystalline silicon , 2009 .

[5]  Sergio Pizzini,et al.  Towards solar grade silicon: Challenges and benefits for low cost photovoltaics , 2010 .

[6]  V. Mihailetchi,et al.  Effect of iron in silicon feedstock on p- and n-type multicrystalline silicon solar cells , 2008 .

[7]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Recombination activity of interstitial iron and other transition metal point defects in p- and n-type crystalline silicon , 2004 .

[8]  Guy Beaucarne,et al.  WAFER-BASED CRYSTALLINE SILICON MODULES AT 1 €/WP: FINAL RESULTS FROM THE CRYSTALCLEAR INTEGRATED PROJECT , 2009 .

[9]  N. Enjalbert,et al.  Effect of intentional bulk contamination with iron on multicrystalline silicon solar cell properties , 2007 .

[10]  Herfried Behnken,et al.  Research on efficiency limiting defects and defect engineering in silicon solar cells - results of the German research cluster SolarFocus , 2011 .

[11]  R. Hall Electron-Hole Recombination in Germanium , 1952 .

[12]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Dynamics of light-induced FeB pair dissociation in crystalline silicon , 2004 .

[13]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Effect of gettered iron on recombination in diffused regions of crystalline silicon wafers , 2006 .

[14]  T. Buonassisi,et al.  Impurity‐to‐efficiency simulator: predictive simulation of silicon solar cell performance based on iron content and distribution , 2011 .

[15]  Sébastien Dubois,et al.  Influence of iron contamination on the performances of single-crystalline silicon solar cells: Computed and experimental results , 2006 .

[16]  Karsten Bothe,et al.  Recombination activity of interstitial chromium and chromium-boron pairs in silicon , 2007 .

[17]  Eicke R. Weber,et al.  Iron and its complexes in silicon , 1999 .

[18]  W. Warta,et al.  Impact of Iron and Molybdenum in Mono and Multicrystalline Float-Zone Silicon Solar Cells , 2007 .

[19]  A. Cuevas,et al.  General parameterization of Auger recombination in crystalline silicon , 2002 .

[20]  J.R. Davis,et al.  Impurities in silicon solar cells , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[21]  K. Wambach,et al.  Impact of Metal Contamination in Silicon Solar Cells , 2010 .

[22]  R. M. Swanson,et al.  Approaching the 29% limit efficiency of silicon solar cells , 2005, Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005..

[23]  W. Read,et al.  Statistics of the Recombinations of Holes and Electrons , 1952 .

[24]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Numerical modeling of textured silicon solar cells using PC-1D , 1990 .

[25]  Antonio Luque,et al.  Acceptable contamination levels in solar grade silicon: From feedstock to solar cell , 2009 .