Sequential Decision Making in Computational Sustainability via Adaptive Submodularity

Many problems in computational sustainability require making a sequence of decisions in complex, uncertain environments. Such problems are generally notoriously difficult. In this article, we review the recently discovered notion of adaptive submodularity, an intuitive diminishing returns condition that generalizes the classical notion of submodular set functions to sequential decision problems. Problems exhibiting the adaptive submodularity property can be efficiently and provably near-optimally solved using simple myopic policies. We illustrate this concept in several case studies of interest in computational sustainability: First, we demonstrate how it can be used to efficiently plan for resolving uncertainty in adaptive management scenarios. Secondly, we show how it applies to dynamic conservation planning for protecting endangered species, a case study carried out in collaboration with the US Geological Survey and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

[1]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[2]  David Vose,et al.  Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling , 1996 .

[3]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[4]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Adaptive Submodularity: Theory and Applications in Active Learning and Stochastic Optimization , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[5]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Optimal Value of Information in Graphical Models , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[6]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Submodular Function Maximization , 2014, Tractability.

[7]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Quantitative Incidence Function Model and Persistence of an Endangered Butterfly Metapopulation , 1996 .

[8]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Cascades Using Network Design , 2010, UAI.

[9]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Dynamic Resource Allocation in Conservation Planning , 2011, AAAI.

[10]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Information Value Theory , 1966, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[11]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[12]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-Optimal Bayesian Active Learning with Noisy Observations , 2010, NIPS.

[13]  Sarah J. Converse,et al.  Special Issue Article: Adaptive management for biodiversity conservation in an uncertain world Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program , 2011 .