Application of a Three-Tiered Response To Intervention Model for Instructional Planning, Decision Making, and the Identification of Children in Need of Services

An alternative to the IQ-achievement discrep ancy model for identifying students with learn ing disabilities is the response to intervention (RTI) model. There is a growing literature base in support of the RTI model, and within the reauthorization of IDEA there is an allowance for an RTI approach whereby RTI "may" be used by school psychologists when evaluating students for special education. The research base on RTI is expanding but there has been little empirical work directed toward understanding RTI as it is implemented by school-based practitioners. The current study examined a simple three-phase RTI model. Universal screening in mathematics was used in Phase I in conjunction with a brief skill/per formance deficit assessment to identify stu dents in need of instructional intervention. In Phase II, a classwide intervention was imple mented to evaluate the extent to which poor academic performance was a function of lack of instruction. Phase III provided intensive intervention to five students who did not respond adequately to the classwide interven tion. Only one student did not respond ade quately to individual intervention.

[1]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems , 2003 .

[2]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters , 2000 .

[3]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Responsiveness‐to‐Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct , 2003 .

[4]  B. Martens,et al.  Improving oral reading fluency: a brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  Theodore J. Christ,et al.  The Generalizability of CBM Survey-Level Mathematics Assessments: Just How Many Samples Do We Need? , 2002 .

[6]  F. E. Lentz,et al.  The Instructional Hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. , 1996 .

[7]  E. Shapiro,et al.  Validating Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading from a Behavioral Perspective. , 1992 .

[8]  K. Gansle,et al.  Using Brief Assessments to Identify Effective Interventions for Individual Students , 2001 .

[9]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing Kindergartners' Mathematical Development: Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies , 2001, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  D. Tingstrom,et al.  A Group Math Intervention: The Modification of Cover, Copy, and Compare for Group Application , 1994 .

[11]  B. Martens,et al.  A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback , 1997 .

[12]  D. Barnett,et al.  Response to Intervention , 2004 .

[13]  Dawn Eddy Molloy,et al.  The Validity of a Response-to-Instruction Paradigm to Identify Reading Disabilities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Individual Differences and Contextual Factors , 2003 .

[14]  S. P. Ardoin,et al.  Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs , 2000 .

[15]  L. Fuchs Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues , 2003 .

[16]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[17]  Rollanda E. O'Connor Increasing the Intensity of Intervention in Kindergarten and First Grade , 2000 .

[18]  D. Speece,et al.  Classification in Context: An Alternative Approach to Identifying Early Reading Disability. , 2001 .

[19]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Differentiating Between Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Principles for the Prevention and Intervention of Mathematics Difficulties , 2001 .

[21]  A. Vanderheyden,et al.  Development and Validation of a Process for Screening Referrals to Special Education , 2003 .

[22]  C. Skinner,et al.  Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Treatment for Improving Mathematics Fluency. , 2000 .