Numerical and experimental analysis of airborne particles control in an operating theater

The design of a ventilation system for operating theaters (OT) is aimed to reduce the patient infection risk while maintaining adequate comfort and productivity for the surgical staff. Nowadays, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) represents an important tool to simulate the airflow pattern in an operating theater and its ability to remove airborne particles. The CFD advantages, compared to experimental campaigns, consist in the ability to test different configurations, in the ease of implementation and in time and money savings. The aim of this work is to numerically and experimentally investigate an OT with a layout according to the Standard DIN 1946-4. Moreover the effectiveness of a differential airflow diffusion system on reducing the particle concentration above the operating table is analyzed. The supply air comes from a ceiling filter system composed of 23 H14 filters, which assures an unidirectional flow with differential air velocities over the protected area. In order to experimentally evaluate the performance and the protection grade SG, according to DIN 1946-4, and to validate the numerical results, a measuring campaign has been carried out within a laboratory setup of an OT. Two different scenarios have been adopted to evaluate the protection level against the entry of external and internal contaminant loads into the protected area. For both cases, the simulated and measured particle concentration in the protected area agree well, and the differential air flow diffusion system is able to maintain the desired protective effect (SG) against contamination load in both the design and the off-design conditions.

[1]  Farhad Memarzadeh,et al.  Comparison of Operating Room Ventilation Systems in the Protection of the Surgical Site , 2002 .

[2]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[3]  Sture Holmberg,et al.  Surgical clothing systems in laminar airflow operating room: a numerical assessment. , 2014, Journal of infection and public health.

[4]  J. Tinkler,et al.  The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds. , 1982, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  Sture Holmberg,et al.  Influence of staff number and internal constellation on surgical site infection in an operating room , 2014 .

[6]  Tu Guangbei,et al.  Study on biological contaminant control strategies under different ventilation models in hospital operating room , 2008 .

[7]  Tin-Tai Chow,et al.  Dynamic simulation on impact of surgeon bending movement on bacteria-carrying particles distribution in operating theatre , 2012 .

[8]  Thomas M. Lawrence,et al.  Air Distribution Strategy Impact on Operating Room Infection Control , 2007 .

[9]  T. Shih,et al.  A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation , 1994 .

[10]  H. Humphreys,et al.  A UK historical perspective on operating theatre ventilation. , 2002, The Journal of hospital infection.

[11]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Comparison of the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for predicting particle transport in enclosed spaces , 2007 .

[12]  S. A. Morsi,et al.  An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  T. Chow,et al.  Ventilation performance in the operating theatre against airborne infection: numerical study on an ultra-clean system. , 2005, The Journal of hospital infection.

[14]  Jelena Srebric,et al.  CFD boundary conditions for contaminant dispersion, heat transfer and airflow simulations around human occupants in indoor environments , 2008 .

[15]  Henrik Brohus,et al.  Influence of disturbances on bacteria level in an operating room , 2008 .

[16]  Guangbei Tu,et al.  Numerical study on effects of door-opening on airflow patterns and dynamic cross-contamination in an ISO class 5 operating room , 2009 .

[17]  O M Lidwell,et al.  Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rates. , 1983, The Journal of hospital infection.

[18]  J. Charnley,et al.  Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip‐joint with special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating room , 1969, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  Farhad Memarzadeh,et al.  Effect of Operation Room Geometry and Ventilation System Parameter Variations on the Protection of the Surgical Site , 2004 .

[20]  M. Vos,et al.  Laying-up of sterile instruments in the operating theatre: equal or superior protection by using a horizontal unidirectional air flow system. , 2013, The Journal of hospital infection.

[21]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  A CFD-based test method for control of indoor environment and space ventilation , 2010 .

[22]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Air quality in hospital operating rooms , 2008 .

[23]  Tin-Tai Chow,et al.  Performance of ventilation system in a non-standard operating room , 2003 .

[24]  Yang-Cheng Shih,et al.  Numerical study on the dispersion of airborne contaminants from an isolation room in the case of door opening , 2008, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[25]  Alessandro Mora,et al.  CFD modeling of the Dry-Sorbent-Injection process for flue gas desulfurization using hydrated lime , 2013 .