Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades

Prism adaptation has been shown to successfully alleviate symptoms of hemispatial neglect, yet the underlying mechanism is still poorly understood. In this study, the antisaccade task was used to measure the effects of prism adaptation on spatial attention in healthy participants. Results indicated that prism adaptation did not influence the saccade latencies or antisaccade errors, both strong measures of attentional deployment, despite a successful prism adaptation procedure. In contrast to visual attention, prism adaptation evoked a perceptual bias in visual space as measured by the landmark task. We conclude that prism adaptation has a differential influence on visual attention and visual perception in healthy participants as measured by the tasks used.

[1]  Adam P. Morris,et al.  Prism Adaptation and Spatial Attention: A Study of Visual Search in Normals and Patients with Unilateral Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[2]  Jason B Mattingley,et al.  Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Walker,et al.  Saccadic eye movement programming in unilateral neglect , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The influence of attending to multiple locations on eye movements , 2005, Vision Research.

[5]  K. Heilman,et al.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[6]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  S. Stigchel,et al.  The imbalance of oculomotor capture in unilateral visual neglect , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Cognitive bias induced by visuo‐motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  S. Hutton,et al.  The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[11]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  S. Everling,et al.  The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A. Milner,et al.  To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect , 2004, Neuroreport.

[16]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Carine Michel,et al.  Simulating unilateral neglect in normals: myth or reality? , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[18]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task , 2009, Cortex.

[19]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[20]  J. Danckert,et al.  Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[21]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. , 1970, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[22]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Eye movements tell only half the story , 2003, Neurology.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[24]  A. Milner,et al.  Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect , 2008, Neuroreport.