Modeling and Managing Urban Growth at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Parcel-Level Model of Residential Land Use Change

As many local and state governments in the United States grapple with increasing growth pressures, the need to understand the economic and institutional factors underlying these pressures has taken on added urgency. From an economic perspective, individual land use decisions play a central role in the manifestation of growth pressures, as changes in land use pattern are the cumulative result of numerous individual decisions regarding the use of lands. In this study, the issue of growth management is addressed by developing a spatially disaggregated, microeconomic model of land conversion decisions suitable for describing residential land use change at the rural-urban fringe. The model employs parcel-level data on land use in Calvert County, Maryland, a rapidly growing rural-urban fringe county. A probabilistic model of residential land use change is estimated using a duration model, and the parameter estimates are employed to simulate possible future growth scenarios under alternative growth management scenarios. Results suggest that “smart growth” objectives are best met when policies aimed at concentrating growth in target areas are implemented in tandem with policies designed to preserve rural or open space lands.

[1]  J. Landis.  IMAGINING LAND USE FUTURES: APPLYING THE CALIFORNIA URBAN FUTURES MODEL , 1995 .

[2]  A. Downs.  Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline , 1999 .

[3]  Ming Zhang,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 2: Specification and Calibration Results of the Land-Use Change Submodel , 1998 .

[4]  E. Irwin,et al.  Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns , 2002 .

[5]  A. Nelson.  Characterizing Exurbia , 1992 .

[6]  William Matthew Semple.  URBAN sprawl. , 1952, British medical journal.

[7]  Mark M. Fleming.  Techniques for Estimating Spatially Dependent Discrete Choice Models , 2004 .

[8]  N. Bockstael,et al.  Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS , 1997 .

[9]  Frank D. Lewis,et al.  The Transition of Land to Urban Use , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[11]  J. Landis,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 1: Model Logic and Theory , 1998 .

[12]  Anthony Downs,et al.  The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited , 1998 .

[13]  F K Benfield,et al.  Solving Sprawl: Models of Smart Growth in Communities Across America , 2001 .

[14]  Kathleen P. Bell,et al.  Land Use Patterns and Water Quality: The Effect of Differential Land Management Controls , 1998 .

[15]  Robert W. Helsley,et al.  The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth , 1989 .

[16]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: \ISolving Sprawl: Models of Smart Growth in Communities across America\N by F. Kaid Benfield, utka Terris, and Nancy Vorsanger. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Natural Resources Defense Council, 2001 , 2002 .

[17]  K. Taylor,et al.  Auroras earth's grand show of lights , 2001 .

[18]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .