Two naturally occurring, generally recognized as safe compounds, namely, caprylic acid (CA) (1%) and b-resorcylic acid (BR) (1%), and their combination, applied at 23 and 60uC were evaluated for their antimicrobial effects against Escherichia coli O157:H7 on cattle hides in the presence and absence of bovine feces. Fresh cleaned cattle hides were cut into pieces (5 cm), air dried, and inoculated with a five-strain mixture of nalidixic acid–resistant (50 mg/ml) E. coli O157:H7 (,8.0 log CFU). The hide samples were air dried under a biosafety hood for 2 h and sprayed with 95% ethanol, 1% CA, 1% BR, or a mixture of 1% CA and 1% BR at 23 or 60uC. The hide samples were kept at 23uC, and E. coli O157:H7 populations were determined at 2 and 5 min after treatment. Both CA and BR were effective in decreasing E. coli O157:H7 populations on hides by 3 to 4 log CFU/cm (P , 0.05). Sterile bovine feces had no effect on the decontaminating property of CA and BR on cattle hides (P . 0.05). Results of this study indicate that CA and BR could potentially be used to decontaminate cattle hides, but follow-up research under slaughterhouse conditions is warranted. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a significant concern for the beef industry. Cattle act as the major reservoir host of this pathogen, where it colonizes the terminal rectum, particularly an anatomical area within the terminal rectum referred to as the recto-anal junction (35). E. coli O157:H7 is shed in the feces, thereby leading to pathogen contamination and persistence on the hide (5, 10, 27, 38). Pathogens from hides of contaminated animals can spread to other animals during transport and lairaging through direct body contact or indirectly by contact with contaminated floors and surfaces (38). The prevalence rate for E. coli O157:H7 on cattle hides ranges from 11% (22) to 76% (7). Since E. coli O157:H7 may persist on cattle hides for extended periods of time, strategies that reduce the fecal load of the pathogen in animals may not be effective to prevent carcass contamination on a long-term basis (8). Moreover, hide prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 has been reported as a more accurate predictor for carcass contamination than fecal prevalence of the pathogen (9). Although carcass muscle surfaces are sterile, pathogen transfer from hide to meat surface can occur during slaughter and dressing operations. Since carcass contamination with pathogens is strongly correlated to hide contamination (5, 6, 11, 13, 14), it is critical to decrease E. coli O157:H7 populations on cattle hides in order to reduce the risk of foodborne outbreaks from beef products. Moreover, treatments that effectively eradicate or reduce E. coli O157:H7 on hides would be crucial for the successful implementation of hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) programs by the meat industry (39, 43, 44). Caprylic acid (CA; octanoic acid) is a natural, 8-carbon, medium-chain fatty acid present in breast milk, bovine milk, and coconut oil (26, 25, 46). b-Resorcylic acid (BR; 2,4dihydroxybenzoic acid) is a phytophenolic compound widely distributed among the angiosperms and is a secondary metabolite that plays a key role in the biochemistry and physiology of plants (24). CA (CFR 184.1025) (28, 45) and BR (CAS RN no. 89-86 [Everything Added to Food in the United States]) (24, 29) are approved for use in foods by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Previous research conducted in our laboratory revealed that CA and BR were effective in inactivating a variety of pathogenic bacteria in different matrices (3, 28–31, 34). The objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of CA, BR, and their combination (CAzBR) applied at 23 and 60uC in the presence or absence of bovine feces for reducing E. coli O157:H7 on cattle hides. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains. All bacteriological media were obtained from BD (Sparks, MD). Five isolates of E. coli O157:H7 were used for the study (obtained from Dr. Michael P. Doyle, Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin). E. coli O157:H7 strains used in this study include E16 (meat isolate), E10 (meat isolate), E8 (meat isolate), E22 (calf feces isolate), and E6 (milk isolate). All the aforementioned strains possess both stx1 and stx2. The strains E8, E10, E16, and E22 belong to pulsed-field gel * Author for correspondence. Tel: 860-486-0947; Fax: 860-486-4375; E-mail: kumar.venkitanarayanan@uconn.edu. 318 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2013, Pages 318–322 doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-248 Copyright G, International Association for Food Protection D ow naded rom hp://m eridianenpress.com /jfp/article-pdf/76/2646/0362-028x_jfp-12-248.pdf by gest on 14 Sptem er 2020 electrophoresis profile pattern II, whereas E6 belongs to pulsedfield gel electrophoresis profile pattern I (32). All strains of the pathogen were induced to resistance to nalidixic acid (NA) (50 mg/ ml), as described by Zhao et al. (47). For confirming resistance to the antibiotic, the cultures were streaked on tryptic soy agar (TSA; Difco, BD) supplemented with 50 mg of NA per ml (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and growth was checked after incubation at 37uC for 24 h. Inoculum preparation. Each bacterial isolate was cultured separately in 10 ml of sterile tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco, BD) supplemented with 50 mg of NA per ml at 37uC for 24 h with agitation (150 rpm). Following incubation, the cultures were sedimented by centrifugation (4uC, 8,000 | g for 10 min), washed twice, and resuspended in 10 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.3). The bacterial population in each culture was determined by plating 0.1-ml portions of serial dilutions (1:10 in PBS) on duplicate TSAzNA plates with incubation at 37uC for 24 h. Equal volumes containing approximately equal populations from each of the five strains were combined, and 500 ml of the suspension was used as the inoculum (,8 log CFU/0.5 ml). Inoculation and treatment of hide samples. The antibacterial efficacy of CA and BR (both from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) to reduce E. coli O157:H7 on cattle hide was determined as described previously (2, 4, 20). Fresh cattle hides were collected from slaughtered cows at a local slaughterhouse. Pieces of the hides (5 by 5 cm) were cut, cleaned with 70% ethanol, and air dried under a laminar flow hood prior to the experiment. E. coli O157:H7 (,8.0 log CFU/0.5 ml) was applied in drops onto each hide piece and spread evenly using a sterile spreader. The inoculated hide pieces were dried in a laminar flow hood (inside temperature, 23uC) for 2 h. After drying, each hide piece was sprayed with a spray bottle (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) containing 25 ml of sterile deionized water, or 95% ethanol, or 1% CA, or 1% BR, or a mixture of 1% CA and 1% BR that was dissolved in 95% ethanol. Each treatment solution was tempered at 23 or 60uC prior to application on hide. Hide samples were kept in a vertical position during spraying. The average distance from the spray nozzle to the hide was 5 cm, and the spray bottle was held at an angle of 90u during the entire spraying time. Control hide samples were not subjected to any spraying. The control and treated hide samples were kept at room temperature (23uC), and the surviving E. coli O157:H7 population was determined at 2 and 5 min after treatment. Since fecal matter, a common contaminant present on cattle hide, could potentially reduce the efficacy of CA and BR for inactivating E. coli O157:H7 (1, 19), the experiment was repeated in the presence of 1% autoclaved bovine feces added on hide samples. Briefly, an E. coli O157:H7 inoculum was prepared in PBS containing 1% sterile feces (wt/vol) and applied onto each hide piece, which was allowed to dry and subjected to the treatments as before. Three replicate samples of cattle hide were included for each treatment and control at each temperature, and the entire experiment was repeated four times. Enumeration of E. coli O157:H7. A sterile cellulose sponge (Dukal Corporation, Ronkonkoma, NY) premoistened with 10 ml of maximum recovery diluent (Oxoid Division, Unipath Co., NY) was used to swab each hide sample five times, and the sponge was placed in a sterile stomacher bag (Fisher Scientific Co. LLC, Hanover Park, IL) containing 40 ml of maximum recovery diluent and pummeled in a stomacher (Tekmar, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) for 1 min. The diluent was serially diluted in PBS, and appropriate dilutions were plated on TSAzNA plates and incubated at 37uC for 24 h. Representative colonies of bacteria from sorbitol MacConkey agar plus methyl umbelliferyl-b-D-glucuronate (SMAzMUG) were confirmed as E. coli O157 by E. coli O157 latex agglutination test (Oxoid Division, Unipath Co., Ogdensburg, NY). Statistical analysis. Data from the four independent replicate experiments were pooled. The effects of bovine feces, CA and BR, sampling time, and temperature and their interaction on E. coli O157:H7 counts were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Variation among replicates was used as the error term. Data were expressed as least squares means, and differences were considered significant at P values of ,0.05.
[1]
D. Donoghue,et al.
Caprylic acid reduces Salmonella Enteritidis populations in various segments of digestive tract and internal organs of 3- and 6-week-old broiler chickens, therapeutically.
,
2012,
Poultry science.
[2]
I. Upadhyaya,et al.
Efficacy of Octenidine Hydrochloride for Reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes on Cattle Hides
,
2012,
Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[3]
R. P. Ross,et al.
Assessment of Escherichia coli O157:H7-specific bacteriophages e11/2 and e4/1c in model broth and hide environments.
,
2011,
International journal of food microbiology.
[4]
X. Nou,et al.
Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Cattle Hides
,
2011,
Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[5]
M. A. Amalaradjou,et al.
Inactivation of Salmonella spp. on tomatoes by plant molecules.
,
2011,
International journal of food microbiology.
[6]
K. Venkitanarayanan,et al.
Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of plant-derived molecules in increasing the sensitivity of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 to antibiotics.
,
2010,
Foodborne pathogens and disease.
[7]
S. Bunčić,et al.
Treatment of cattle hides with Shellac-in-ethanol solution to reduce bacterial transferability--a preliminary study.
,
2010,
Meat science.
[8]
D. Donoghue,et al.
Prophylactic supplementation of caprylic acid in feed reduces Salmonella enteritidis colonization in commercial broiler chicks.
,
2009,
Journal of food protection.
[9]
A. Charles,et al.
Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle drinking-water by trans-cinnamaldehyde.
,
2008,
Foodborne pathogens and disease.
[10]
J. Sofos,et al.
Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of multiple beef hide decontamination strategies to reduce levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella.
,
2008,
Journal of food protection.
[11]
J. Sofos,et al.
Studies to evaluate chemicals and conditions with low-pressure applications for reducing microbial counts on cattle hides.
,
2008,
Journal of food protection.
[12]
D. Donoghue,et al.
Therapeutic Supplementation of Caprylic Acid in Feed Reduces Campylobacter jejuni Colonization in Broiler Chicks
,
2008,
Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[13]
J. Sofos,et al.
Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century.
,
2008,
Meat science.
[14]
S. Shackelford,et al.
Effects of a minimal hide wash cabinet on the levels and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on the hides of beef cattle at slaughter.
,
2007,
Journal of food protection.
[15]
S. Shackelford,et al.
Transportation and lairage environment effects on prevalence, numbers, and diversity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on hides and carcasses of beef cattle at processing.
,
2007,
Journal of food protection.
[16]
P. Marek,et al.
Inactivation of escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle drinking water by sodium caprylate.
,
2006,
Journal of food protection.
[17]
K. Venkitanarayanan,et al.
Antibacterial effect of caprylic acid and monocaprylin on major bacterial mastitis pathogens.
,
2005,
Journal of dairy science.
[18]
S. Shackelford,et al.
Efficacy of ozonated and electrolyzed oxidative waters to decontaminate hides of cattle before slaughter.
,
2005,
Journal of food protection.
[19]
S. Bunčić,et al.
An evaluation of selected methods for the decontamination of cattle hides prior to skinning.
,
2005,
Meat Science.
[20]
D. M. Allen,et al.
Development and evaluation of an on-line hide decontamination procedure for use in a commercial beef processing plantt.
,
2005,
Journal of food protection.
[21]
P. Marek,et al.
In vitro inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine rumen fluid by caprylic acid.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[22]
X. Nou,et al.
Characterization of O157:H7 and other Escherichia coli isolates recovered from cattle hides, feces, and carcasses.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[23]
J. O. Reagan,et al.
Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 and levels of aerobic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae are reduced when hides are washed and treated with cetylpyridinium chloride at a commercial beef processing plant.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[24]
D. M. Allen,et al.
Escherichia coli O157 prevalence and enumeration of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli O157 at various steps in commercial beef processing plants.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[25]
J. Savell,et al.
Decontamination of cattle hides prior to slaughter using washes with and without antimicrobial agents.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[26]
J. O. Reagan,et al.
Protocol for evaluating the efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride as a beef hide intervention.
,
2004,
Journal of food protection.
[27]
X. Nou,et al.
Seasonal prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants.
,
2003,
Journal of food protection.
[28]
J. O. Reagan,et al.
Effect of chemical dehairing on the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the levels of aerobic bacteria and enterobacteriaceae on carcasses in a commercial beef processing plant.
,
2003,
Journal of food protection.
[29]
R. Mandrell,et al.
Antibacterial activities of phenolic benzaldehydes and benzoic acids against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica.
,
2003,
Journal of food protection.
[30]
David G. E. Smith,et al.
Lymphoid Follicle-Dense Mucosa at the Terminal Rectum Is the Principal Site of Colonization of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the Bovine Host
,
2003,
Infection and Immunity.
[31]
S. Bunčić,et al.
Presence of food-borne pathogens on cattle hides
,
2002
.
[32]
J. Keen,et al.
Isolation of shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 from hide surfaces and the oral cavity of finished beef feedlot cattle.
,
2002,
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[33]
R. G. Jensen.
The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000.
,
2002,
Journal of dairy science.
[34]
R. van der Meer,et al.
Bactericidal Activities of Milk Lipids
,
2001,
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
[35]
Karl Ropkins,et al.
Evaluation of worldwide approaches to the use of HACCP to control food safety
,
2000
.
[36]
W. Laegreid,et al.
Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing.
,
2000,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[37]
F. Smulders,et al.
Integrating microbial decontamination with organic acids in HACCP programmes for muscle foods: prospects and controversies.
,
1998,
International journal of food microbiology.
[38]
R. Bell.
Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses
,
1997,
Journal of applied microbiology.
[39]
J. Meng,et al.
Molecular characterisation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and plasmid DNA analysis.
,
1995,
Journal of medical microbiology.
[40]
C. Cutter,et al.
Efficacy of Organic Acids Against Escherichia coli O157:H7 Attached to Beef Carcass Tissue Using a Pilot Scale Model Carcass Washer1.
,
1994,
Journal of food protection.
[41]
R. G. Jensen,et al.
Lipids of bovine and human milks: a comparison.
,
1990,
Journal of dairy science.
[42]
R. G. Jensen.
Composition of bovine milk lipids
,
1973,
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society.
[43]
R. Edelstein.
Rules and Regulations Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia Coli in Certain Raw Beef Products
,
2022
.