Compliance With Antiseptic Hand Rub Use in Intensive Care Units The Hawthorne Effect

Objective. To determine the influence the Hawthorne effect has on compliance with antiseptic hand rub (AHR) use among healthcare personnel. Design. Observational study. Setting. Five intensive care units of a university hospital in Berlin, Germany. Participants. Medical personnel were monitored in 2 periods regarding compliance with AHR use when there were indications for AHR use. In the first period, the personnel had no knowledge of being observed. The second observation period was announced to the staff of the intensive care units in advance and information about what the observer would be monitoring was provided. Potential confounders of compliance with AHR use included occupational groups (nurses, physicians, and other healthcare workers), intensive care units, and indications for AHR use before or after any procedure. Results. Data were collected from 2,808 indications for AHR use. The overall rate of compliance was 29% (95% confidence interval, 26%–32%) in the first period and 45% (95% confidence interval, 43%–47%) in the second period. A logistic regression analysis with potential confounders revealed a significant odds ratio for the comparison between period 2 and period 1. The differences in compliance with AHR use were statistically significant (P<.001) between the occupational groups (nurses had the highest compliance and physicians had middle compliance) and between indication for AHR use before procedures and indication for AHR use after procedures. Conclusions. The Hawthorne effect has a marked influence on compliance with AHR use, with a 55% increase of compliance with overt observation. This result is consistent throughout subgroups. The rate of compliance with AHR use may in fact be lower than we thought because of results from studies that did not take the Hawthorne effect into account. The results of this study underline the necessity for infection control teams to be on wards as often as possible.

[1]  D. Austin,et al.  Risk factors for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an adult intensive care unit: fitting a model to the data. , 2002, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  Stéphane Hugonnet,et al.  Hand Hygiene among Physicians: Performance, Beliefs, and Perceptions , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Matthew H Samore,et al.  Interventional study to evaluate the impact of an alcohol-based hand gel in improving hand hygiene compliance , 2002, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[4]  E. Rich,et al.  Limited Impact of Sustained Simple Feedback Based on Soap and Paper Towel Consumption on the Frequency of Hand Washing in an Adult Intensive Care Unit , 2002, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Resource Utilization Among Patients With Sepsis Syndrome , 2003, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[7]  S. Hugonnet,et al.  Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Pittet,et al.  Outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae Related to Understaffing, Overcrowding, and Poor Hygiene Practices , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  W R Jarvis,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[10]  M. Safar,et al.  Risk factors and outcome of nosocomial infections: results of a matched case-control study of ICU patients. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  Larry J. Anderson,et al.  Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003 recommendations of the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 2004, Respiratory care.

[12]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC / SHEA / APIC / IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force , 2002 .

[13]  Linda K. Stroh,et al.  Organizational behavior. , 1970, Physical therapy.

[14]  H. von Baum,et al.  Differences in Hand Hygiene Behavior Related to the Contamination Risk of Healthcare Activities in Different Groups of Healthcare Workers , 2004, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[15]  M. Gilchrist.  Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance , 1995, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  Acip.  Prevention and control of influenza : recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) , 2004 .

[17]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[18]  D. Pittet,et al.  Compliance with hand hygiene practice in pediatric intensive care , 2001, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[19]  Jordi Rello,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. , 2002, Chest.

[20]  C. Bridges,et al.  Guidelines for preventing health-care--associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 2004, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[21]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.