Towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies: making the tacit explicit

This paper explores the process that occurred among a group of academics at a tertiary institution, as they worked collaboratively over a three-year period in an attempt to situate the teaching of academic literacies within the mainstream curricula of various disciplines of study. The study draws on interview and focus group data, which were produced, using narrative methods such as stimulated recall, free writing and visual representations. Framed by New Literacy Studies and Rhetorical Studies theory, and drawing on the data from participating academics, the paper explicates a model for the process of integrating academic literacies into disciplines. The unfolding model presents factors to be considered when designing integrated approaches to the teaching of academic literacies, and the findings suggest that higher education needs to create discursive spaces for the collaboration of language lecturers and disciplinary specialists. The paper concludes that it is through sustained interaction with language lecturers that disciplinary specialists are able to make their tacit knowledge of the literacy practices and discourse patterns of their disciplines, explicit. Such collaboration enables both language lecturers and disciplinary specialists to shift towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies.

[1]  Cecilia Jacobs,et al.  On being an insider on the outside: new spaces for integrating academic literacies , 2005 .

[2]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[3]  J. Gee Reading as Situated Language : A Sociocognitive Perspective , 2001 .

[4]  G. Smart The new work order: behind the language of the new capitalism , 2000 .

[5]  Nicholas M. Allix Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[6]  M. Eraut Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  James Paul Gee,et al.  The New Literacy Studies and the "Social Turn.". , 1999 .

[8]  Douglas Vipond,et al.  The Researcher as Missionary: Problems with Rhetoric and Reform in the Disciplines , 1998, College Composition & Communication.

[9]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[10]  J. Gee,et al.  The New Work Order , 1996 .

[11]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[12]  C. Geisler Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing and Knowing in Academic Philosophy , 1994 .

[13]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Literacy and Expertise in the Academy , 1994 .

[14]  David A. Jolliffe,et al.  The Second Stage in Writing across the Curriculum , 1991 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  J. Gee Social Linguistics and Literacies , 1990 .

[17]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[18]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .