Immigration delays but does not prevent adaptation following environmental change: experimental evidence

An important and pressing goal in conservation is to determine how to effectively manage populations experiencing environmental change. When populations begin to decline, extinction will occur unless populations can adapt in response to natural selection, a process called evolutionary rescue. Theory predicts that immigration can delay extinction and provide novel genetic material that may reduce inbreeding depression and facilitate adaptation. However, when potential source populations have not experienced the new environment before (i.e., are naive), immigration can counteract selection and constrain adaptation. This study evaluated the effects of immigration of naive individuals on evolutionary rescue using the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, as a model system. Small populations were exposed to a challenging environment, and three immigration rates (0, 1, or 5 migrants per generation) were implemented with migrants from a benign environment. Following an initial decline in population size across all treatments, populations receiving no immigration gained a positive growth rate one generation earlier than those with immigration, illustrating the constraining effects of immigration on adaptation. After seven generations, a reciprocal transplant experiment found evidence for local adaptation regardless of immigration rate. Thus, while the immigration of naive individuals briefly delayed adaptation, it did not increase extinction risk or prevent adaptation to severe and abrupt environmental change.

[1]  B. Melbourne,et al.  How density dependence, genetic erosion and the extinction vortex impact evolutionary rescue , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  B. Melbourne,et al.  Population demographic history and evolutionary rescue: Influence of a bottleneck event , 2023, bioRxiv.

[3]  B. Melbourne,et al.  Genetic mixing facilitates adaptation to a novel environmental constraint , 2023, Ecological Entomology.

[4]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Dispersal syndromes in challenging environments: A cross‐species experiment , 2022, Ecology letters.

[5]  Else Lasker-schüler Herbst , 2022, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[6]  J. Waters,et al.  Anthropogenic evolution in an insect wing polymorphism following widespread deforestation , 2021, Biology Letters.

[7]  Lewis G. Spurgin,et al.  Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology , 2021, Heredity.

[8]  S. Muff,et al.  Immigration counter‐acts local micro‐evolution of a major fitness component: Migration‐selection balance in free‐living song sparrows , 2021, Evolution letters.

[9]  C. Wondji,et al.  Cytochrome P450 metabolic resistance (CYP6P9a) to pyrethroids imposes a fitness cost in the major African malaria vector Anopheles funestus , 2020, Heredity.

[10]  A. Hess,et al.  Management. , 2020, Anesthesiology.

[11]  Gideon S. Bradburd,et al.  Genomic and Fitness Consequences of Genetic Rescue in Wild Populations , 2019, Current Biology.

[12]  D. Bonte,et al.  Transient local adaptation and source–sink dynamics in experimental populations experiencing spatially heterogeneous environments , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[13]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  Mixed evidence for adaptation to environmental pollution , 2019, Evolutionary applications.

[14]  S. Tavener,et al.  The power of evolutionary rescue is constrained by genetic load , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[15]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Correction to ‘Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences’ , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  R. Frankham Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis , 2016 .

[19]  S. R. Palli,et al.  Transcription factors, CncC and Maf, regulate expression of CYP6BQ genes responsible for deltamethrin resistance in Tribolium castaneum. , 2015, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[20]  C. Richards,et al.  Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Jacolien van Rij,et al.  itsadug: Interpreting Time Series and Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs , 2015 .

[22]  R. Frankham Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[23]  M. Lascoux,et al.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Matthew M. Osmond,et al.  How Competition Affects Evolutionary Rescue , 2013, bioRxiv.

[25]  D. Bolnick,et al.  Non-random gene flow: an underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  F. Allendorf,et al.  How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs? , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  P. Dutilleul,et al.  Large-scale, spatially-explicit test of the refuge strategy for delaying insecticide resistance , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  S. Wood Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[29]  Paul J. Rathouz,et al.  Semiparametric generalized linear models , 2008 .

[30]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity , 2008, Nature.

[31]  D. Crowder,et al.  Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  C. Schultz,et al.  Can captive rearing promote recovery of endangered butterflies? An assessment in the face of uncertainty , 2007 .

[34]  S. Yeaman,et al.  Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. de Pina-Cabral World , 2004, Science.

[36]  T. Kawecki,et al.  Conceptual issues in local adaptation , 2004 .

[37]  T. Lenormand Gene flow and the limits to natural selection , 2002 .

[38]  D. Tallmon,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Beneficial Fitness Effects of Gene Flow in Recently Isolated Populations , 2001 .

[39]  Edwin H. Lowe,et al.  Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? , 1999 .

[40]  P. Kandela Pollution , 1999, The Lancet.

[41]  S. Via Cannibalism facilitates the use of a novel environment in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum , 1999, Heredity.

[42]  J. Stuart,et al.  Genetic mapping of a major locus controlling pyrethroid resistance in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). , 1998, Journal of economic entomology.

[43]  P. Collins Inheritance of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) , 1998 .

[44]  F. Allendorf,et al.  The One‐Migrant‐per‐Generation Rule in Conservation and Management , 1996 .

[45]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  WHEN DOES EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION PREVENT EXTINCTION? , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  M. Eto,et al.  Effect of larval density on whole-body biogenic amine levels of Tribolium freemani hinton , 1993 .

[47]  L. Stevens THE GENETICS AND EVOLUTION OF CANNIBALISM IN FLOUR BEETLES (GENUS TRIBOLIUM) , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  M Slatkin,et al.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. , 1987, Science.

[49]  P. Meadows … and ecology , 1977, Nature.

[50]  D. Tallmon,et al.  Genetic rescue to the rescue. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[52]  節子 等々力,et al.  Tribolium castaneum の幼虫と成虫へのガンマ線の影響 , 2013 .

[53]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers , 2009, Conservation Genetics.

[54]  A. Friedman,et al.  Evolution and ecology , 2008 .

[55]  Richard Frankham,et al.  Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Improvement of reproductive fitness due to immigration of one individual into small partially inbred populations , 1992 .

[56]  R. Frankham,et al.  Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Rapid genetic adaptation to captivity , 1992 .

[57]  Bryan W. Lewis,et al.  Additive Models , 2022 .

[58]  Fitting linear mixed-effects models , 2022 .