On the effects of pointing jitter, actuator drift, telescope rolls, and broadband detectors in dark hole maintenance and electric field order reduction

Abstract. Space coronagraphs are projected to detect exoplanets that are at least 1010 times dimmer than their host stars. Yet, the actual detection threshold depends on the instrument’s wavefront stability and varies by an order of magnitude with the choice of observation strategy and postprocessing method. We consider the performance of the previously introduced observation strategy (dark hole maintenance) and postprocessing algorithm [electric field order reduction (EFOR)] in the presence of various realistic effects. In particular, it will be shown that under some common assumptions, the telescope’s averaged pointing jitter translates into an additional light source incoherent with the residual light from the star (speckles), and that jitter “modes” can be identified in postprocessing and distinguished from a planet signal. We also show that the decrease in contrast due to drift of voltages in deformable mirror actuators can be mitigated by recursive estimation of the electric field in the high-contrast region of the image (dark hole) using electric field conjugation. Moreover, this can be done even when the measured intensity is broadband as long as it is well approximated by an incoherent sum of monochromatic intensities. Finally, we assess the performance of closed-loop versus open-loop observation scenarios through a numerical simulation of the Wide-Field Infra-Red Survey Telescope. In particular, we compare the postprocessing factors of angular differential imaging with and without EFOR, which we extended to account for possible telescope rolls and the presence of pointing jitter. For all observation parameters considered, closed-loop dark hole maintenance resulted in significantly higher postprocessing accuracy.

[1]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  An efficient approximation of the Kalman filter for multiple systems coupled via low-dimensional stochastic input , 2019, Autom..

[2]  N. Jeremy Kasdin,et al.  WFIRST coronagraph technology requirements: status update and systems engineering approach , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  John E. Krist,et al.  Stability error budget for an aggressive coronagraph on a 3.8 m telescope , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[4]  Fang Shi,et al.  Testbed demonstration of high-contrast coronagraph imaging in search for Earth-like exoplanets , 2019, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[5]  Olivier Guyon,et al.  The Habitable Exoplanet (HabEx) Imaging Mission: preliminary science drivers and technical requirements , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[6]  Laurent Pueyo,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization: Robust Extraction of Extended Structures , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Angular Differential Imaging: A Powerful High-Contrast Imaging Technique , 2005, astro-ph/0512335.

[8]  Amir Give'on,et al.  Broadband wavefront correction algorithm for high-contrast imaging systems , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  Dwight Moody,et al.  WFIRST coronagraph flight performance modeling , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Leonid Pogorelyuk,et al.  Maintaining a dark hole in a high contrast coronagraph and the effects of speckles drift on contrast and post processing factor , 2019, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[11]  Olivier Guyon,et al.  Lessons for WFIRST CGI from ground-based high-contrast systems , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  R. Soummer,et al.  DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANETS AND DISKS USING PROJECTIONS ON KARHUNEN–LOÈVE EIGENIMAGES , 2012, 1207.4197.

[13]  Dimitri Mawet,et al.  Performance and sensitivity of vortex coronagraphs on segmented space telescopes , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  R. Harrington Part II , 2004 .

[15]  Stuart B. Shaklan,et al.  Fast linearized coronagraph optimizer (FALCO) I: a software toolbox for rapid coronagraphic design and wavefront correction , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[16]  Bertrand Mennesson,et al.  ExoEarth yield landscape for future direct imaging space telescopes , 2019, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems.

[17]  Fang Shi,et al.  High-contrast imaging stability using MEMS deformable mirror , 2019, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  N. Jeremy Kasdin,et al.  Optimal wavefront estimation of incoherent sources , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[19]  Marcia J. Rieke,et al.  A Coronagraphic Search for Substellar Companions to Young Stars , 1998 .

[20]  Amir Give'on,et al.  Pair-wise, deformable mirror, image plane-based diversity electric field estimation for high contrast coronagraphy , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[21]  Kevin France,et al.  The Large UV/Optical/Infrared Surveyor (LUVOIR): Decadal Mission concept design update , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[22]  John E. Krist,et al.  High accuracy coronagraph flight WFC model for WFIRST-CGI raw contrast sensitivity analysis , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[23]  Richard T. Demers Review and update of WFIRST coronagraph instrument design and technology (Conference Presentation) , 2018 .

[24]  Fang Shi,et al.  WFIRST low order wavefront sensing and control (LOWFS/C) performance on line-of-sight disturbances from multiple reaction wheels , 2019, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[25]  D. Mawet,et al.  A DIM CANDIDATE COMPANION TO ϵ CEPHEI , 2011, 1107.3872.

[26]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Reduced Order Estimation of the Speckle Electric Field History for Space-based Coronagraphs , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[27]  Mamadou N'Diaye,et al.  Review of high-contrast imaging systems for current and future ground-based and space-based telescopes: Part II. Common path wavefront sensing/control and coherent differential imaging , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[28]  Adam Amara,et al.  PYNPOINT: An image processing package for finding exoplanets , 2012, 1207.6637.

[29]  John E. Krist,et al.  Sensitivity of the WFIRST coronagraph performance to key instrument parameters , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[30]  N. Jeremy Kasdin,et al.  Dark Hole Maintenance and A Posteriori Intensity Estimation in the Presence of Speckle Drift in a High-contrast Space Coronagraph , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.