THE CORPORATE PERFORMANCE CONUNDRUM: A SYNTHESIS OF CONTEMPORARY VIEWS AND AN EXTENSION

What characterizes superior organizational performance? The question has always fascinated practitioners and academic researchers, and a string of recent bestsellers attests to the current prominence of performance as an organizational issue. This article brings together recent perspectives on performance and provides some further conclusions of its own based on analysis of a new database. Articles on 74 companies rated by Business Month as being one of the five best‐managed companies during each of the 15 years in the 1972–86 timeframe were content analysed in an effort to isolate the key strategic and organizational factors associated with superior corporate performance. Results indicate that superior performance is associated with a broad product line accompanied by geographic diversity, an emphasis on planning coupled with sound financial controls and reporting systems, a high level of commitment to product and process innovation, investments in modernization of manufacturing facilities, a reputation for superior quality and customer service, and progressive human resource management practices. These findings are compared and contrasted with the conclusions of other recent studies and implications of the findings for management are discussed. Far from being the result of applying any particular formula, superior performance is found to require a diverse mix of competencies and values.

[1]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The Validity of ROI as a Measure of Business Performance , 1987 .

[2]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Structured Content Analysis of Cases: A Complementary Method for Organizational Research , 1980 .

[3]  Charles W. Hofer SOME PRELIMINARY RESEARCH ON PATTERNS OF STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR. , 1973 .

[4]  L. G. Hrebiniak,et al.  Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. , 1985 .

[5]  David E. Booth,et al.  An Empirical Critique of In Search of Excellence: How Excellent are the Excellent Companies? , 1986 .

[6]  B. Chakravarthy Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[7]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Risk/Return Performance of Diversified Firms , 1985 .

[8]  M. Hitt,et al.  Peters and Waterman Revisited: The Unended Quest for Excellence , 1987 .

[9]  K. Davidson DO MEGAMERGERS MAKE SENSE , 1987 .

[10]  Milton Leontiades The Rewards of Diversifying Into Unrelated Businesses , 1986 .

[11]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[12]  George H. Haines,et al.  The Ombudsman: Teaching Entrepreneurship , 1988 .

[13]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis , 1989 .

[14]  J. Weston,et al.  TESTS OF THE EFFICIENCY PERFORMANCE OF CONGLOMERATE FIRMS , 1971 .

[15]  H. H. Kassarjian Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[16]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[17]  W. Bruce Johnson,et al.  SHAREHOLDER RETURNS AND CORPORATE EXCELLENCE , 1985 .

[18]  E. H. Bowman Strategy, Annual Reports, and Alchemy , 1978 .