PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Voluntary Action Influences Visual Competition

Converging lines of evidence point to a strong link between action and perception. In this study, we show that this linkage plays a role in controlling the dynamics of binocular rivalry, in which two stimuli compete for perceptual awareness. Observers dichoptically viewed two dynamic rival stimuli while moving a computer mouse with one hand. When the motion of one rival stimulus was consistent with observers' own hand movements, dominance durations of that stimulus were extended and, remarkably, suppression durations of that stimulus were abbreviated. Additional measurements revealed that this change in rivalry dynamics was not attributable to observers' knowledge about the condition under test. Thus, self-generated actions can influence the resolution of perceptual conflict, even when the object being controlled falls outside of visual awareness.

[1]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[2]  A. Sanders.  Attention and performance III : proceedings of a symposium on attention and performance, held in Soesterberg August 4-8,1969, under the auspices of the Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands , 1970 .

[3]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[4]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  C. D. Weert,et al.  A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry , 1993, Vision Research.

[7]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1998, Neural Computation.

[8]  N. Logothetis.  Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Randolph Blake,et al.  How Context Influences Predominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Perception.

[15]  W. Prinz.  Common mechanisms in perception and action. , 2002 .

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[19]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Conflict, consciousness, and control , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  W. Kunde.  Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects , 2004, Psychological research.

[25]  Ian M. Thornton,et al.  Anticipating action in complex scenes , 2004 .

[26]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Walking perception by walking observers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.