On the impact of functional imaging accuracy on selective boosting IMRT.

In order to quantify the impact of loss of functional imaging sensitivity and specificity on tumor control and normal tissue toxicity for selective boosting IMRT four selective boosting scenarios were designed: SB91-81 (EUD=91Gy for the high-risk tumor subvolume and EUD=81Gy for a remaining low-risk PTV (rPTV)), SB80-74, SB90-70, and risk-adaptive optimization. For each sensitivity loss level the loss in tumor control probability (DeltaTCP) was calculated. For each specificity loss level, the increase in rectal and bladder toxicity was quantified using the radiobiological indices (equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)) as well as %-volumes irradiated. The impact of loss in sensitivity on local tumor control was maximal when the prescription dose level for rPTV had the lowest value. The SB90-70 plan had a DeltaTCP=29.6%, the SB91-81 plan had a DeltaTCP=9.5%, while for risk-adaptive optimization a DeltaTCP=4.7% was found. Independent of planning technique loss in functional imaging specificity appears to have a minimal impact on the expected normal tissue toxicity, since an increase in rectal or bladder toxicity as a function of loss in specificity was not observed. Additionally, all plans fulfilled the rectum and the bladder sparing criteria found in the literature for late rectal bleeding and genitourinary complications. Our study shows that the choice of a low-risk classification for the rPTV in selective boosting IMRT may lead to a significant loss in TCP. Furthermore, for the example considered in which normal tissue complications can be limited through the use of a tissue expander it appears that the therapeutic ratio can be improved using a functional imaging technique with a high sensitivity and limited specificity; while for cases were this is not possible, an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity has to be found.

[1]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Practical integration of [18F]-FDG-PET and PET-CT in the planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the technical basis, ICRU-target volumes, problems, perspectives. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Yoichi Watanabe,et al.  A Practical Guide to Intensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2003 .

[4]  S. Apisarnthanarax,et al.  Current Imaging Paradigms in Radiation Oncology , 2005, Radiation research.

[5]  Cornelius A. Tobias,et al.  CHAPTER 4 – Cellular Radiation Biology , 1974 .

[6]  J. Lyman Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms , 1985 .

[7]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial , 2003 .

[8]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Rectal dose sparing with a balloon catheter and ultrasound localization in conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Franca Foppiano,et al.  Relationships between DVHs and late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of a large group of patients pooled from three institutions. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  H. Groen,et al.  Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Quantifying the position and steepness of radiation dose-response curves. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[12]  Richard A Popple,et al.  Tumor control probability for selective boosting of hypoxic subvolumes, including the effect of reoxygenation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  R. Hustinx,et al.  PET scan imaging in oncology. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[14]  Randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules for patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2005 .

[15]  W. van Putten,et al.  Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Lyman Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. , 1985, Radiation research. Supplement.

[17]  Michael B Sharpe,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy: rationale, benefits, and limitations. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  J. Fowler,et al.  Selective boosting of tumor subvolumes. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  B. Carey,et al.  Quantitative Imaging in Oncology , 1996 .

[20]  Franca Foppiano,et al.  Rectal dose-volume constraints in high-dose radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  W. Tomé,et al.  Risk-adaptive optimization: selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  L Verhey,et al.  Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Søren M Bentzen,et al.  Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  C C Ling,et al.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  E S Sternick,et al.  Optimized radiotherapy treatment planning using the complication probability factor (CPF). , 1980, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Daniel W. Miller,et al.  Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[27]  Jake Van Dyk,et al.  Image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART): Radiobiological and dose escalation considerations for localized carcinoma of the prostate. , 2005, Medical physics.

[28]  Leen Paelinck,et al.  The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  F Foppiano,et al.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101). , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  S Mutic,et al.  A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Judy Adams,et al.  A randomized trial comparing conventional dose (70.2GyE) and high-dose (79.2GyE) conformal radiation in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Results of an interim analysis of PROG 95–09 , 2004 .

[32]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Is (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in recurrent colorectal cancer a contribution to surgical decision making? , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[33]  Herman D. Suit,et al.  Radiation response of c3h mouse mammary carcinoma evaluated in terms of cellular radiation sensitivity. In texas, univ. Of, 18th ann. Symp. Fund. Cancer res., 1964. , 1965 .

[34]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[35]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[36]  T. R. Munro,et al.  The relation between tumour lethal doses and the radiosensitivity of tumour cells. , 1961, The British journal of radiology.

[37]  A. Hanlon,et al.  The relationship of increasing radiotherapy dose to reduced distant metastases and mortality in men with prostate cancer , 2004, Cancer.

[38]  D J Brenner,et al.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Intertumoral differences in hypoxia selectivity of the PET imaging agent 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone). , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Tom W J Scheenen,et al.  IMRT boost dose planning on dominant intraprostatic lesions: gold marker-based three-dimensional fusion of CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced and 1H-spectroscopic MRI. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[41]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Is PET-based treatment planning the new standard in modern radiotherapy? The head and neck paradigm. , 2006, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[42]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Evaluation of thoracic tumors with 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. , 2006, Chest.

[43]  D. Song,et al.  Radiation dose escalation as treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: is more really better? , 2005, JAMA.

[44]  R. Mohan,et al.  Comparison of rectal dose-wall histogram versus dose-volume histogram for modeling the incidence of late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose-volume histograms. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Torsten Mattfeldt,et al.  3-deoxy-3-[(18)F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography for noninvasive assessment of proliferation in pulmonary nodules. , 2002, Cancer research.

[47]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study. , 1999, Radiology.

[48]  W. J. Morris,et al.  Randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules for patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  P. Carroll,et al.  The response of the urinary bladder, urethra, and ureter to radiation and chemotherapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[50]  R Mohan,et al.  Optimization of intensity-modulated 3D conformal treatment plans based on biological indices. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[51]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  C. Burman,et al.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[53]  Qing Guo,et al.  Randomized trial comparing iridium implant plus external-beam radiation therapy with external-beam radiation therapy alone in node-negative locally advanced cancer of the prostate. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  B Pickett,et al.  Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[55]  C. Ling,et al.  Risk group dependence of dose-response for biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[56]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.