Look at Me Now: Investigating Delayed Disengagement for Ambiguous Human-Robot Stimuli

Human-like appearance has been shown to positively affect perception of and attitudes towards robotic agents. In particular, the more human-like robots look, the more participants are willing to ascribe human-like states to them (i.e., having a mind, emotions, agency). The positive effect of human-likeness on agent ratings, however, does not translate to better performance in human-robot interaction (HRI). Performance first increases as human-likeness increases, then drops dramatically as soon as human-likeness reaches around 70 % to finally reach its maximum at 100 % humanness. The goal of the current paper is to investigate whether attentional mechanisms, in particular delayed disengagement, are responsible for the drop in performance for very human-like, but not perfectly human agents. The idea is that robots with a high degree of human-likeness capture attention and thus make it harder to orient attention away from them towards task-relevant stimuli in the periphery resulting in bad performance. To investigate this question, faces of differing degrees of human-likeness (0 %, 30 %, 70 %, 100 %, non-social control) are presented to participants in an eye-tracking experiment and the time it takes participants to orient towards a peripheral stimulus is measured. Results show significant delayed disengagement for all stimuli, but no stronger delayed disengagement for very human-like agents, making delayed disengagement an unlikely source for the negative effect of human-like appearance on performance in HRI.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Angry faces hold the eyes , 2011 .

[2]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  J. V. Bavel,et al.  Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat , 2014 .

[4]  Eva Wiese,et al.  Agent Appearance Modulates Mind Attribution and Social Attention in Human-Robot Interaction , 2015, ICSR.

[5]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes , 2006, HRI '06.

[7]  Shiori Sato,et al.  Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces , 2014, Psychological Research.

[8]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Assessing Human Likeness by Eye Contact in an Android Testbed , 2005 .

[10]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley , 2016, Cognition.

[11]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Does the Presence of Social Agents Improve Cognitive Performance on a Vigilance Task? , 2015, ICSR.

[12]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces , 2002, Cognition & emotion.

[13]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[14]  Alain Goudey,et al.  Must smart objects look human? Study of the impact of anthropomorphism on the acceptance of companion robots , 2016 .

[15]  Anna S. Law,et al.  Attention capture by faces , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[17]  Christian A. Gonzalez,et al.  Seeing Minds in Others – Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences? , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[19]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence? , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  D. Lakens,et al.  At face value: Categorization goals modulate vigilance for angry faces , 2011 .

[22]  A M Burton,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  T. Wheatley,et al.  The Tipping Point of Animacy , 2010, Psychological science.

[24]  Richard Pak,et al.  Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults , 2012, Ergonomics.

[25]  M. Peterson,et al.  Evidence from the eyes: Threatening postures hold attention , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .

[27]  Andrew M. Penner,et al.  Looking the Part: Social Status Cues Shape Race Perception , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Fang-Wu Tung,et al.  Influence of Gender and Age on the Attitudes of Children towards Humanoid Robots , 2011, HCI.

[29]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.