Design and Optimization of Low-Thrust Trajectories with Gravity Assists

Missions such as Mariner 10, Voyager 1, Galileo, and Stardust all used gravity-assist flybys to achieve their mission goals efficiently. Methods to design such gravity-assist missions are fairly well developed and generally assume all major maneuvers are performed impulsively by chemical rockets. The recent success of the low-thrust Deep Space 1 mission demonstrates that low-thrust (high-efficiency) propulsion is ready to be used on future missions, potentially reducing the required propellant mass or the total time of flight. By combining both gravity-assist flybys and low-thrust propulsion, future missions could enjoy the benefits of both. To realize such missions, an effective design methodology is needed. A two-step approach to the design and optimization of low-thrust gravity-assist trajectories is described. The first step is a search through a broad range of potential trajectories. To speed up this search, a simplified shape-based trajectory model is used. The best trajectories are chosen using a heuristic cost function. The second step optimizes the most promising trajectories using an efficient parameter optimization. method. Examples of missions designed using this approach are presented, including voyages to Vesta, Tempel 1, Ceres, Jupiter, and Pluto.

[1]  J. Kawaguchi,et al.  Frequent access to Mercury in the early 21st century: Multiple Mercury flyby mission via electric propulsion , 1996 .

[2]  A. Petropoulos,et al.  A shape -based approach to automated, low-thrust, gravity -assist trajectory design , 2001 .

[3]  G. Colasurdo,et al.  Trajectories Towards Near-Earth-Objects Using Solar Electric Propulsion , 1999 .

[4]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Shape-Based Algorithm for Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2004 .

[5]  Richard H. Battin,et al.  The Determination of Round-Trip Planetary Reconnaissance Trajectories , 1959 .

[6]  C. A. Kluever,et al.  OPTIMAL LOW-THRUST ILNTERPLANETARY TRAJECTORIES BY DIRECT METHOD TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[7]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Automated Design of Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2000 .

[8]  Craig A. Kluever.  Heliospheric Boundary Exploration Using Ion Propulsion Spacecraft , 1997 .

[9]  Victoria Coverstone-Carroll,et al.  Benefits of solar electric propulsion for the next generation of planetary exploration missions , 1997 .

[10]  Steven N. Williams,et al.  Optimal low thrust trajectories using differential inclusion concepts , 1994 .

[11]  Yves Langevin,et al.  Chemical and solar electric propulsion options for a cornerstone mission to mercury , 2000 .

[12]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  USER’S GUIDE FOR SNOPT 5.3: A FORTRAN PACKAGE FOR LARGE-SCALE NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2002 .

[13]  J. Longuski,et al.  Design and Optimization of Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectories to Selected Planets , 2002 .

[14]  C. G. Sauer.  Solar electric earth gravity assist /SEEGA/ missions to the outer planets , 1979 .

[15]  Lorenzo Casalino,et al.  Optimal Low-Thrust Escape Trajectories Using Gravity Assist , 1999 .

[16]  Jon A. Sims,et al.  Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Interplanetary Missions , 1997 .

[17]  John V. Breakwell,et al.  Researches in Interplanetary Transfer , 1961 .

[18]  J. Sims,et al.  Trajectory Options for Ice and Fire Preproject Missions Utilizing Solar Electric Propulsion (Extended Abstract) , 1998 .

[19]  C. G. Sauer,et al.  Solar electric propulsion combined with earth gravity assist - A new potential for planetary exploration , 1976 .

[20]  H. Meissinger,et al.  SEP Planetary Missions with 'Earth Gravity Assist Using an Initial Out-of-Ecliptic Thrust Phase , 1999 .