Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the influence of platform switching on crestal bone level changes at non-submerged titanium implants over a period of 6 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS Titanium implants (n=72) were placed at 0.4 mm above the alveolar crest in the lower jaws of 12 dogs and randomly assigned to either matching or non-matching (circumferential horizontal mismatch of 0.3 mm) healing abutments. At 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, dissected blocks were processed for histomorphometrical analysis. Measurements were made between the implant shoulder (IS) and the apical extension of the long junctional epithelium (aJE), the most coronal level of bone in contact with the implant (CLB), and the level of the alveolar bone crest (BC). RESULTS At 24 weeks, differences in the mean IS-aJE, IS-CLB, and IS-BC values were 0.2 +/- 1.2, 0.3 +/- 0.7, and 0.3 +/- 0.8 mm at the buccal aspect, and 0.2 +/- 0.9, 0.3 +/- 0.5, and 0.3 +/- 0.8 mm at the lingual aspect, respectively. Comparisons between groups revealed no significant differences at either the buccal or the lingual aspects. CONCLUSIONS It was concluded that (i) bone remodelling was minimal in both groups and (ii) platform switching may not be of crucial importance for maintenance of the crestal bone level.

[1]  R. Haas,et al.  Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  K. Donath The diagnostic value of the new method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue (Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique). , 1985, Pathology, research and practice.

[3]  Markus B Hürzeler,et al.  Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  M. Kern,et al.  In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  D. Cochran,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  J. Wennström,et al.  Dental Abstracts , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  B Rangert,et al.  Forces and moments on Branemark implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effect of Microthreads and Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: a histomorphometric pilot study in dogs. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  C. Han,et al.  A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  Yoshinobu Maeda,et al.  Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  Heoung-Jae Chun,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  J. Lindhe,et al.  The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  N. Lang,et al.  Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. , 1989 .

[21]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[22]  Richard J Lazzara,et al.  Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[23]  G Zarb,et al.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.