Data Quality Dependent Decision Making in Pattern Classification

Sensory information acquired by pattern recognition systems is invariably subject to environmental and sensing conditions, which may change over time. This may have a significant negative impact on the performance of pattern recognition algorithms. In the past, these problems have been tackled by building in invariance to the various changes, by adaptation and by multiple expert systems. More recently, the possibility of enhancing the pattern classification system robustness by using auxiliary information has been explored. In particular, by measuring the extent of degradation, the resulting sensory data quality information can be used with advantage to combat the effect of the degradation phenomena. This can be achieved by using the auxiliary quality information as features in the fusion stage of a multiple classifier system which uses the discriminant function values from the first stage as inputs. Data quality can be measured directly from the sensory data. Different architectures have been suggested for decision making using quality information. Examples of these architectures are presented and their relative merits discussed. The problems and benefits associated with the use of auxiliary information in sensory data analysis are illustrated on the problem of personal identity verification in biometrics.

[1]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Matching Scores for LDA-based Face Verification , 2000, BMVC.

[2]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Networks , 2008, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Validating a Biometric Authentication System: Sample Size Requirements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Hong Yan,et al.  Comparison of face verification results on the XM2VTFS database , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[7]  Josef Kittler,et al.  On Combination of Face Authentication Experts by a Mixture of Quality Dependent Fusion Classifiers , 2007, MCS.

[8]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Quality-Based Score Normalization With Device Qualitative Information for Multimodal Biometric Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[9]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models , 2000, Digit. Signal Process..

[10]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[11]  Wen Gao,et al.  Performance Characterisation of Face Recognition Algorithms and Their Sensitivity to Severe Illumination Changes , 2006, ICB.

[12]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Local binary patterns as an image preprocessing for face authentication , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[13]  Ralph Gross,et al.  An Image Preprocessing Algorithm for Illumination Invariant Face Recognition , 2003, AVBPA.

[14]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Quality dependent fusion of intramodal and multimodal biometric experts , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Samy Bengio,et al.  User authentication via adapted statistical models of face images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.