A new viewpoint on risk control decision models for natural disasters

This study describes a critical assessment of the risk control decision model from a methodological perspective and identifies major shortcomings with the employment of enhanced formal evaluation and decision-making methods. This in turn could have major applications for natural disaster risk control. The methodology follows the description of interpretive structural modeling (ISM), which is an interactive learning process in which a set of different and directly related elements is structured to form a comprehensive systemic model. The next step explores the potentials of different mathematical programming approaches in order to improve decision making, i.e., for the development of an economic utility constrained-maximization model that addresses the issue of optimal budget allocation under a trade-off framework. Several aspects of risk and uncertainty are discussed within the context of an economic utility constrained-maximization model with a major focus on the importance of risk and uncertainty in research evaluation, and how the strategy determines the insurance and risk control plans.

[1]  M. Bar-Hillel The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[2]  Prem Vrat,et al.  Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation , 1990 .

[3]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[4]  Sushil,et al.  The objectives of waste management in India: A futures inquiry , 1995 .

[5]  A. Sohal,et al.  RESISTANCE: A CONSTRUCTIVE TOOL FOR CHANGE , 1998 .

[6]  H. Katayama,et al.  Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice , 1999 .

[7]  A. Sohal,et al.  Critical success factors in agile supply chain management ‐ An empirical study , 2001 .

[8]  Markus Biehl,et al.  International supply chain agility ‐ Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty , 2001 .

[9]  R. Handfield,et al.  The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness , 2002 .

[10]  R. Shankar,et al.  An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries , 2003 .

[11]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  E. Fontela,et al.  Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision‐making groups , 2005 .

[13]  R. Shankar,et al.  ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG THE BARRIERS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[14]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[15]  R. Shankar,et al.  Modeling agility of supply chain , 2007 .

[16]  David Etkin,et al.  People and community as constituent parts of hazards: the significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis , 2007 .

[17]  Anne van der Veen,et al.  Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation , 2008 .

[18]  C. Yi,et al.  GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic loss from flood damage: pre-feasibility study for the Anyang Stream Basin in Korea , 2010 .

[19]  Huicong Jia,et al.  Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective , 2010 .