Implicit Interaction with an Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicle: Relations of Pedestrians’ Gaze Behavior with Situation Awareness and Perceived Risks

Interactions between pedestrians and automated vehicles (AVs) will increase significantly with the popularity of AV. However, pedestrians often have not enough trust on the AVs , particularly when they are confused about an AV's intention in a interaction. This study seeks to evaluate if pedestrians clearly understand the driving intentions of AVs in interactions and presents experimental research on the relationship between gaze behaviors of pedestrians and their understanding of the intentions of the AV. The hypothesis investigated in this study was that the less the pedestrian understands the driving intentions of the AV, the longer the duration of their gazing behavior will be. A pedestrian--vehicle interaction experiment was designed to verify the proposed hypothesis. A robotic wheelchair was used as the manual driving vehicle (MV) and AV for interacting with pedestrians while pedestrians' gaze data and their subjective evaluation of the driving intentions were recorded. The experimental results supported our hypothesis as there was a negative correlation between the pedestrians' gaze duration on the AV and their understanding of the driving intentions of the AV. Moreover, the gaze duration of most of the pedestrians on the MV was shorter than that on an AV. Therefore, we conclude with two recommendations to designers of external human-machine interfaces (eHMI): (1) when a pedestrian is engaged in an interaction with an AV, the driving intentions of the AV should be provided; (2) if the pedestrian still gazes at the AV after the AV displays its driving intentions, the AV should provide clearer information about its driving intentions.

[1]  Richard Norman,et al.  Dimensions of attitudes to autonomous vehicles , 2019, Urban, Planning and Transport Research.

[2]  Hiroshi Murase,et al.  Personal Mobility Vehicle Autonomous Navigation Through Pedestrian Flow: A Data Driven Approach for Parameter Extraction , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[3]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Autonomous personal mobility scooter for multi-class mobility-on-demand service , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[4]  D. Lakens,et al.  Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch's t-test Instead of Student's t-test with Unequal Group Sizes , 2017 .

[5]  Pascual Martínez-Gómez,et al.  Recognition of understanding level and language skill using measurements of reading behavior , 2014, IUI.

[6]  Svante Wold,et al.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) , 1989 .

[7]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Should an Automated Vehicle Communicate Its Intention to a Pedestrian? - A Virtual Reality Study , 2019, IHSED.

[8]  Andreas Riener,et al.  Strategies for Negotiation between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2015, MuC Workshopband.

[9]  Yann Blumer,et al.  Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes: How acceptability matters , 2014 .

[10]  Gunnar Prause,et al.  On the Regulatory Framework for Last-Mile Delivery Robots , 2018, Machines.

[11]  Stefanie M. Faas,et al.  Yielding Light Signal Evaluation for Self-driving Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction , 2019, IHSED.

[12]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .

[13]  I. Nourbakhsh,et al.  On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Atsushi Watanabe,et al.  Communicating robotic navigational intentions , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[17]  Andreas Riener,et al.  How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?: A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[18]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Understanding the Messages Conveyed by Automated Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[19]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Koichi Kise,et al.  Estimation of reading subjective understanding based on eye gaze analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[21]  Koichi Kise,et al.  Using the Eye Gaze to Predict Document Reading Subjective Understanding , 2017, 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR).

[22]  Riender Happee,et al.  External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .

[24]  Miguel Figliozzi,et al.  Study of Sidewalk Autonomous Delivery Robots and Their Potential Impacts on Freight Efficiency and Travel , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[25]  Peter Thomas,et al.  Pedestrian Decision-Making Responses to External Human-Machine Interface Designs for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[26]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions - A Wizard of Oz Study , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).