Intensity standardization in breast MR images improves tissue quantification

Computerized algorithms are increasingly being developed for quantifying breast MRI features for facilitating lesion detection and breast tissue segmentation in various clinical applications. One of the current impediments is the intensity non-standardness of the breast tissue in the acquired MR images across different cases, scanners, and/or patients. This degrades the performance of quantitative image processing. In this work, we investigate the usefulness of post-hoc intensity standardization of breast MR images by using a landmark-based nonlinear intensity mapping algorithm. The standardization algorithm is applied after correction of the images for background bias field non-uniformity. We then quantitatively compare the percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) of image intensity in the fibroglandular (e.g., dense) tissue region before and after standardization to evaluate the standardization procedure. In our experiments, we use 9 representative 3D bilateral breast MRI scans/cases constituting 18 breasts (a total of 504 tomographic breast MRI slices), in which we observe a significant decrease of the %CV in the standardized images, indicating that standardization significantly reduces the intensity variation for the fibroglandular tissue across these cases. Furthermore, we demonstrate for two segmentation methods that the standardization process leads to improved segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue. Our work suggests that intensity standardization following bias field correction may serve as an effective preprocessing step to support improved quantitative breast MR image processing and analysis, particularly for breast density quantification.

[1]  Mitchell D. Schnall,et al.  Fully automated chest wall line segmentation in breast MRI by using context information , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jennifer D. Brooks,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. , 2011, Radiology.

[3]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  L G Nyúl,et al.  On standardizing the MR image intensity scale , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  A Russell Localio,et al.  Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Intensity standardization simplifies brain MR image segmentation , 2009, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  Shandong Wu,et al.  Fully-Automated Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[10]  Michael Khazen,et al.  A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Shandong Wu,et al.  Atlas-Based Probabilistic Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI , 2012, MICCAI.