Measurement of Presence in large scale Virtual environments

It is now widely accepted that a sense of presence in a virtual environment is a crucial part of the success of the ‘experience’. This paper extends the authors previous work in naturalistic interfaces and perception of image to test experimentally the degree to which the type of interface and visual nature of the virtual environment determine the experience of presence or ‘being there’ in a large scale architectural virtual environment. The importance of presence to the success of architectural virtual environments is an important discussion. Should architectural VEs strive to be hyper-real (with all the attendant hardware issues of manipulating large amounts of data in real-time) or does a degree of abstraction in representation still afford an acceptable degree of presence?

[1]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[2]  Mel Slater,et al.  Presence in immersive virtual environments , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[3]  T A Stoffregen,et al.  The role of balance dynamics in the active perception of orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Kevin Arthur Effects of field of view on task performance with head-mounted displays , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[6]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  The role of rest frames in vection, presence and motion sickness , 1998 .

[8]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994 .

[9]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[10]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.