An Australian approach to concept development and experimentation: linking strategy to capability

Defence forces continue to evolve as new technologies, approaches to warfare and roles are introduced. With defence being a significant ongoing investment for any nation, and with the typical longevity of the capabilities involved, there are challenges in developing a robust force able to meet its national interests against a backdrop of a changing strategic landscape and constrained budgets. In an effort to address these challenges, an analytical construct has been developed for experimentation that provides a traceable linkage from government guidance through to the capability implications. A key component of the construct is to provide those involved in experimentation exercises with a suitable representation of an active dynamic adversary who is able to stress their responses and expose key vulnerabilities and potential capability tipping points. The principle adopted is that more is learnt by examining the breaking points of the system. This paper outlines the framework and some of the tools and techniques developed in its support. The proposed construct also incorporates a level of scrutiny to establish confidence in results obtained. The framework has been successfully applied to the Australian Defence Capability Program.

[1]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  NATO Code of Best Practice for C2 Assessment - Implications for SISO , 2002 .

[2]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Resurrecting the Future of Operational Research , 1979 .

[3]  J. Filar,et al.  Games, Incompetence, and Training , 2007 .

[4]  Drew Lathin,et al.  The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups , 1997 .

[5]  Richard A. Kass The Logic of Warfighting Experiments , 2006 .

[6]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Justifying the methods of OR , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Analytical Methods for Studies and Experiments on Transforming the Force , 1999 .

[8]  Robert Y. Cavana Practical strategy: structured tools and techniques , 2007 .

[9]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[10]  David S Alberts Code of Best Practice: Experimentation , 2002 .

[11]  Russell Rhyne Technological forecasting within alternative whole futures projections , 1974 .

[12]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Facilitated modelling in operational research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Williamson Murray,et al.  The dynamics of military revolution 1300—2050: Thinking about revolutions in warfare , 2001 .

[14]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Campaigns of Experimentation: Pathways to Innovation and Transformation , 2005 .

[15]  Roger Schwarz,et al.  The Skilled Facilitator , 1994 .

[16]  Timothy E. Somes,et al.  The Art of Wargaming , 1991 .

[17]  Williamson Murray,et al.  Experimental Units: The Historical Record , 2002 .

[18]  Peter J. Dortmans,et al.  ‘Doing the right problem’ versus ‘doing the problem right’: problem structuring within a Land Force environment , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[20]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Why modelling and model use matter , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Tony Flowerdew,et al.  New Methods of Thought and Procedure , 1968 .