Evidence for the Use of Hearing Assistive Technology by Adults: The Role of the FM System

Hearing assistive technologies include listening, alerting, and/or signaling devices that use auditory, visual, and/or tactile modalities to augment communication and/or facilitate awareness of environmental sounds. The importance of hearing assistive technologies in the management of adults with hearing loss was recently acknowledged in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline developed by the American Academy of Audiology. Most currently available evidence for hearing assistive technology use by adults focuses on frequency-modulated (FM) technology. Previous research is reviewed that demonstrates the efficacy of FM devices for adults in terms of laboratory measures of speech understanding in noise. Also reviewed are the outcomes from field trials of FM use by community-dwelling adults, which, to date, have been disappointing. Few to no individuals, in previous studies, elected to use FM devices at the end of the trial periods. Data are presented from a 1-group pretest-posttest study examining the role of extensive counseling, coaching, and instruction on FM use by adults. In addition, the potential influence of the cost of devices to the individual was eliminated by conducting the study with veterans who were eligible to receive FM systems through the Veterans Affairs National Hearing Aid Program. Positive outcomes were obtained at the end of a 6-week trial period and were found to remain 1 year after study completion. Implications for increasing the evidence base for the use of FM devices by adults are discussed.

[1]  The effect of hearing aids and frequency modulation technology on results from the communication profile for the hearing impaired. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  L. Wong,et al.  Hearing Aid Satisfaction: What Does Research from the Past 20 Years Say? , 2003, Trends in amplification.

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M Samantha Lewis,et al.  Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  I. M. Ventry,et al.  The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a New Tool , 1982, Ear and hearing.

[7]  C. Broadbent,et al.  An Investigation of the Applicability of the Inventory, Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, at 2 Weeks Post Hearing Aid Fitting , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[8]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[9]  R. Cox Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[11]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Hearing aids and assistive listening devices. , 1992, South Dakota journal of medicine.

[13]  Arthur Boothroyd Hearing Aid Accessories for Adults: The Remote FM Microphone , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[14]  H. Dillon,et al.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[16]  M E Demorest,et al.  Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  J. Jerger,et al.  Comparison of Conventional Amplification and an Assistive Listening Device in Elderly Persons , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[18]  10-Year Customer Satisfaction Trends in the US Hearing Instrument Market , 2002 .

[19]  M. Valente,et al.  Audiology: Practice Management , 2000 .

[20]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[21]  D Byrne,et al.  Evaluation of the National Acoustic Laboratories' new hearing aid selection procedure. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.