Visually Linked Keywords to Support Exploratory Browsing

Academic digital library searchers often employ exploratory search strategies when faced with the complex search task of finding academic literature on a topic that is new to them. Unfortunately, the interfaces employed by academic digital libraries provide little support for exploratory browsing, which is a critical first step in exploratory search. To address this shortcoming, we have designed and implemented a novel academic digital library interface (KLink Search) with two new features: visually linked keywords and an interactive workspace. Here, we present preliminary analysis of data collected in a controlled laboratory study (n=32) comparing KLink Search to a baseline interface. Participants reported higher degrees of usefulness, ease-of-use, satisfaction, and knowledge gain after using KLink Search. Participants spent more time on the search tasks, and were able to collect sets of documents that were highly relevant to the tasks. Results from this research illustrate the value of adding lightweight visual and interactive features to academic digital library search interfaces to support exploratory browsing.

[1]  Anton Babichev,et al.  SciNoon: Exploratory Search System for Scientific Groups , 2019, IUI Workshops.

[2]  Xue Dong Yang,et al.  Evaluating WordBars in exploratory Web search scenarios , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  A Survey on Visual Approaches for Analyzing Scientific Literature and Patents , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  PaperQuest: A Visualization Tool to Support Literature Review , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Kari-Jouko Räihä,et al.  The advantages of a cross-session web workspace , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Sung-Hyon Myaeng,et al.  An Interactive Information Seeking Interface for Exploratory Search , 2008, ICEIS.

[7]  Daniel Tunkelang,et al.  Faceted Search , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[9]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[10]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[11]  Orland Hoeber,et al.  A Study of Academic Search Scenarios and Information Seeking Behaviour , 2019, CHIIR.

[12]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Tools-at-hand and learning in multi-session, collaborative search , 2010, CHI.

[13]  Antonina Dattolo,et al.  VisualBib: Narrative Views for Customized Bibliographies , 2018, 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV).

[14]  Marti A. Hearst Search User Interfaces , 2009 .

[15]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Interactive information retrieval , 2008, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Everyday Cross-session Search: How and Why Do People Search Across Multiple Sessions? , 2020, CHIIR.

[17]  Ralf Krestel,et al.  Visual interfaces for stimulating exploratory search , 2011, JCDL '11.

[18]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Sebastian Koch,et al.  Visual Analysis and Dissemination of Scientific Literature Collections with SurVis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Jon Chamberlain,et al.  A Visual Approach to Query Formulation for Systematic Search , 2019, CHIIR.

[21]  Wen Lou,et al.  PaperPoles: Facilitating adaptive visual exploration of scientific publications by citation links , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Jaakko Peltonen,et al.  Topic-Relevance Map: Visualization for Improving Search Result Comprehension , 2017, IUI.

[23]  Max L. Wilson Search User Interface Design , 2011, Search User Interface Design.

[24]  H. Schmidt,et al.  The relation between individual interest and knowledge acquisition , 2017 .

[25]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[26]  Abdigani Diriye,et al.  Designing a tool for exploratory information seeking , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[27]  Orland Hoeber,et al.  Information Visualization for Interactive Information Retrieval , 2018, CHIIR.

[28]  Orland Hoeber,et al.  Supporting academic search tasks through citation visualization and exploration , 2017, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[29]  Orland Hoeber,et al.  Web Information Retrieval Support Systems: The Future of Web Search , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[30]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[31]  Xue Dong Yang,et al.  HotMap: Supporting visual exploration of Web search results , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..