Effects of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends on Conventional Vehicle Emissions

Tests were conducted during 2008 on 16 late-model, conventional vehicles (1999 through 2007) to determine short-term effects of mid-level ethanol blends on performance and emissions. Vehicle odometer readings ranged from 10,000 to 100,000 miles, and all vehicles conformed to federal emissions requirements for their federal certification level. The LA92 drive cycle, also known as the Unified Cycle, was used for testing as it was considered to more accurately represent real-world acceleration rates and speeds than the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) used for emissions certification testing. Test fuels were splash-blends of up to 20 volume percent ethanol with federal certification gasoline. Both regulated and unregulated air-toxic emissions were measured. For the aggregate 16-vehicle fleet, increasing ethanol content resulted in reductions in average composite emissions of both NMHC and CO and increases in average emissions of ethanol and aldehydes. Changes in average composite emissions of NMOG and NOX were not statistically significant. By segregating the vehicle fleet according to power-enrichment fueling strategy, a better understanding of ethanol fuel-effect on emissions was realized. Vehicles found to apply longterm fuel trim (LTFT) to power-enrichment fueling showed no statistically significant fuel effect on NMOG, NMHC, CO or NOX. For vehicles found to not apply LTFT to power-enrichment, statistically significant reductions in NMHC and CO were observed, as was a statistically significant increase in NOX emissions. Effects of ethanol on NMOG and NMHC emissions were found to also be influenced by power-to-weight ratio, while the effects on NOX emissions were found to be influenced by engine displacement.

[1]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Strategies for Enhancing Low-Temperature Activity , 2004 .

[2]  Harry C. Watson,et al.  Predicting Fuel Consumption and Emissions-Transferring Chassis Dynamometer Results to Real Driving Conditions , 1983 .

[3]  J. F. Thomas,et al.  Technical Issues Associated with the Use of Intermediate Ethanol Blends ( > E 10 ) in the U . S . Legacy Fleet : Assessment of Prior Studies August 2007 , 2008 .

[4]  W. O. Siegl,et al.  Improved Emissions Speciation Methodology for Phase II of the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program - Hydrocarbons and Oxygenates , 1993 .

[5]  J. Yanowitz,et al.  Effect of E85 on Tailpipe Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  Harry C. Watson,et al.  Effects of a Wide Range of Drive Cycles on the Emissions from Vehicles of Three Levels of Technology , 1995 .

[7]  Tao Huai,et al.  The effect of fuel sulfur on NH3 and other emissions from 2000-2001 model year vehicles , 2004 .

[8]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Albert M. Hochhauser,et al.  Review of Prior Studies of Fuel Effects on Vehicle Emissions , 2009 .

[10]  J. E. Thoss,et al.  The Impact of Fuel Sulfur Level on FTP Emissions - Effect of PGM Catalyst Type , 1997 .

[11]  Jun Li,et al.  Sulfur Poisoning and Desulfation of the Lean NOx Trap , 2001 .

[12]  Ronald L. Graves,et al.  Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 - Updated , 2008 .

[13]  King D. Eng,et al.  Effect of Fuel Sulfur on Emissions in California Low Emission Vehicles , 1998 .

[14]  Venkatesh Rao,et al.  Investigation into the Vehicle Exhaust Emissions of High Percentage Ethanol Blends , 1995 .