Agronomic and physiological responses of a tomato crop to nitrogen input

Abstract Two field experiments were carried out during 2005 and 2006 to study the effect of four N-fertilization rates (0 (N0), 100 (N100), 200 (N200), and 300 (N300) kg ha−1) on yield, growth, N uptake, and N use efficiency of processing tomato in a silty-clay soil under Mediterranean conditions. N supply positively affected LAI (leaf area index), radiation use efficiency (RUE), above-ground dry weight (DW) and N accumulation. The respective maximum values 4.6, 1.16 g MJ−1, 13.4 Mg ha−1, and 383 kg ha−1 were detected with N300. However, passing from the N200 to the N300 rate, the DW and the N tissue content mostly increased in the vegetative organs resulting in lower total and marketable yield, attributable mainly to the lower number of fruit in N300 plants. N excess exacerbates the unbalanced vegetative/reproductive plant growth which occurred when seasonal temperatures negatively affected crop productivity by reducing fruit load. Maximum total and marketable yield were obtained with the N200 rate and were respectively 155 and 119 Mg ha−1 in 2005 and 135 and 104 Mg ha−1 in 2006 season. N supply quadratically decreased the agronomical (NUEa) and physiological (NUEp) N use efficiency, these indices reaching a maximum with the N200 rate (NUEa = 11.8 kg kg−1, NUEp = 15.1 kg kg−1). However, increasing N supply decreased partial factor productivity and the efficiency in N fertilizer recovery linearly to 24 and 0.55 kg kg−1. Nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) was 0.8 in N0 plants and increased up to 1.3–1.4 with N300. Under Mediterranean conditions and with the specific tomato cultivar, the N200 rate can be considered the most efficient both in terms of yield and NUE, and the respective NNI values of 1.15–1.23 (in the period from maximum LAI to harvest) could be associated with the optimal N nutritional status of the crop indicating that the minimal N concentration to obtain the maximum above-ground DW is higher than that proposed as critical for this crop. From an environmental standpoint, a 200 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer dose would put this production system in N balance, with N removal from the field being close to 200 kg ha−1 with a yield goal of 100–120 kg ha−1 of marketable fruits containing 1.97 kg Mg−1 of N.

[1]  Michael P. Bange,et al.  Nitrogen and light responses of cotton photosynthesis and implications for crop growth , 2003 .

[2]  A. Marani,et al.  Predicting Harvesting Date of Processing Tomatoes by a Simulation Model , 1986, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[3]  S. Adams,et al.  Effect of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Tomato Fruits , 2001 .

[4]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Tomato nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling , 2009 .

[5]  G. Lemaire,et al.  From Agronomy and Ecophysiology to Molecular Genetics for Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crops , 2006 .

[6]  Paolo Benincasa,et al.  Critical nitrogen concentration in processing tomato , 2002 .

[7]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Diagnosis tool for plant and crop N status in vegetative stage Theory and practices for crop N management , 2008 .

[8]  D. J. Fitter,et al.  The Contribution of Leaves from Different Levels within a Tomato Crop to Canopy Net Photosynthesis: An Experimental Examination of Two Canopy Models , 1978 .

[9]  Ahmet Ertek,et al.  Effects of different irrigation programs and nitrogen levels on nitrogen concentration, uptake and utilisation in processing tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum) , 2006 .

[10]  Croissance estivale en matière sèche de peuplements de fétuque élevée (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) et de dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.) dans l'Ouest de la France. I. Etude en conditions de nutrition azotée et d'alimentation hydrique non limitantes , 1987 .

[11]  G. Bélanger,et al.  Growth Analysis of a Tall Fescue Sward Fertilized with Different Rates of Nitrogen , 1992 .

[12]  J. Maranville,et al.  NITROGEN FERTILIZER RESPONSE AND USE EFFICIENCY FOR THREE CEREAL CROPS IN NIGER , 2001 .

[13]  Tim Hartz,et al.  Nitrogen Requirements of Drip- irrigated Processing Tomatoes , 2009 .

[14]  M. Monsi Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[15]  Croissance estivale en matière sèche de peuplements de fétuque élevée (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) et de dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.) dans l'Ouest de la France. II. Interaction entre les niveaux d'alimentation hydrique et de nutrition azotée , 1987 .

[16]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Nitrogen Response of Leaf Photosynthesis and Canopy Radiation Use Efficiency in Field-Grown Maize and Sorghum , 1994 .

[17]  Richard E. Plant,et al.  Application of EPIC model to nitrogen cycling in irrigated processing tomatoes under different management systems. , 1998 .

[18]  M. Parisi,et al.  EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN PROCESSING TOMATO , 2006 .

[19]  C. Dordas,et al.  Application of liquid cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers affect dry matter, nitrogen accumulation, and partitioning in maize , 2008, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[20]  Miguel Quemada,et al.  Drainage and nitrate leaching under processing tomato growth with drip irrigation and plastic mulching , 2006 .

[21]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Calibration and validation of complex and simplified tomato growth models for control purposes in the southeast of Spain , 2004 .

[22]  R. Casa,et al.  EFFECTS OF REDUCED IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN FERTIGATION RATE ON YIELD, CARBOHYDRATE ACCUMULATION, AND QUALITY OF PROCESSING TOMATOES , 2001 .

[23]  Gilles Lemaire,et al.  Chapter 8 – Quantifying Crop Responses to Nitrogen Deficiency and Avenues to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency , 2009 .

[24]  V. Sadras,et al.  Radiation-use efficiency of sunflower crops: effects of specific leaf nitrogen and ontogeny , 1995 .

[25]  L. Forte,et al.  Vegetazione e clima della Puglia , 2000 .

[26]  A. Battilani,et al.  FERTIRRIGERE: a simple tool-model for managing water and nutrient supply in drip-irrigated processing tomatoes , 2003 .

[27]  James W. Jones,et al.  Nitrogen stress effects on growth and nitrogen accumulation by field-grown tomato , 2000 .

[28]  G. Hammer,et al.  Distribution of nitrogen and radiation use efficiency in peanut canopies , 1994 .

[29]  Takeshi Horie,et al.  Leaf Nitrogen, Photosynthesis, and Crop Radiation Use Efficiency: A Review , 1989 .

[30]  M. Caloin,et al.  Analysis of the Time Course of Change in Nitrogen Content in Dactylis glomerata L. Using a Model of Plant Growth , 1984 .

[31]  D. J. Greenwood,et al.  Effect of nitrogen fertiliser on the nitrate contents of field vegetables grown in Britain , 1986 .

[32]  Gilles Lemaire,et al.  Growth Rate and % N of Field Grown Crops: Theory and Experiments , 1991 .

[33]  G. Lemaire,et al.  N Uptake and Distribution in Plant Canopies , 1997 .

[34]  C. Green,et al.  Nitrogen nutrition and wheat growth in relation to absorbed solar radiation , 1987 .

[35]  A. Dobermann Nitrogen Use Efficiency – State of the Art , 2005 .