Application of a computationally efficient method to approximate gap model results with a probabilistic approach

Abstract. To be able to simulate climate change effects on forest dynamics over the whole of Switzerland, we adapted the second-generation DGVM (dynamic global vegetation model) LPJ-GUESS (Lund–Potsdam–Jena General Ecosystem Simulator) to the Alpine environment. We modified model functions, tuned model parameters, and implemented new tree species to represent the potential natural vegetation of Alpine landscapes. Furthermore, we increased the computational efficiency of the model to enable area-covering simulations in a fine resolution (1 km) sufficient for the complex topography of the Alps, which resulted in more than 32 000 simulation grid cells. To this aim, we applied the recently developed method GAPPARD (approximating GAP model results with a Probabilistic Approach to account for stand Replacing Disturbances) (Scherstjanoi et al., 2013) to LPJ-GUESS. GAPPARD derives mean output values from a combination of simulation runs without disturbances and a patch age distribution defined by the disturbance frequency. With this computationally efficient method, which increased the model's speed by approximately the factor 8, we were able to faster detect the shortcomings of LPJ-GUESS functions and parameters. We used the adapted LPJ-GUESS together with GAPPARD to assess the influence of one climate change scenario on dynamics of tree species composition and biomass throughout the 21st century in Switzerland. To allow for comparison with the original model, we additionally simulated forest dynamics along a north–south transect through Switzerland. The results from this transect confirmed the high value of the GAPPARD method despite some limitations towards extreme climatic events. It allowed for the first time to obtain area-wide, detailed high-resolution LPJ-GUESS simulation results for a large part of the Alpine region.

[1]  Heike Lischke,et al.  Modeling tree species migration in the Alps during the Holocene: What creates complexity? , 2005 .

[2]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht , 1980 .

[3]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .

[4]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .

[5]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  An ecosystem model-based estimate of changes in water availability differs from water proxies that are commonly used in species distribution models , 2009 .

[6]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[7]  David Whitehead,et al.  Leaf Area Dynamics of Conifer Forests , 1995 .

[8]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Changes in European ecosystem productivity and carbon balance driven by regional climate model output , 2007 .

[9]  F. Woodward,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[10]  G. Rehfeldt,et al.  Assessing Population Responses to Climate in Pinus sylvestris and Larix spp. of Eurasia with Climate-Transfer Models , 2003 .

[11]  J. Landsberg.  A theory of forest dynamics, the ecological implications of forest succession models: by H.H. Shugart 1984, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 278 pp., DM 98- (Cloth). ISBN: 3-540-96000-7 , 1987 .

[12]  H. Shugart.  A Theory of Forest Dynamics , 1984 .

[13]  W. Cramer,et al.  A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate , 1992 .

[14]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Modelling Regional Climate Change Effects On Potential Natural Ecosystems in Sweden , 2006 .

[15]  Annett Wolf,et al.  Temperature response functions introduce high uncertainty in modelled carbon stocks in cold temperature regimes , 2009 .

[16]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[17]  Richard H. W. Bradshaw,et al.  Exploring climatic and biotic controls on Holocene vegetation change in Fennoscandia , 2008 .

[18]  José M. V. Fragoso,et al.  Forecasting Regional to Global Plant Migration in Response to Climate Change , 2005 .

[19]  Emmanuel S. Gritti,et al.  Vulnerability of Mediterranean Basin ecosystems to climate change and invasion by exotic plant species , 2006 .

[20]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Using dynamic vegetation models to simulate plant range shifts , 2014 .

[21]  Hisashi Sato,et al.  SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach , 2007 .

[22]  G. Walther.  Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Benkert,et al.  Ellenberg, H., Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht 3., verbesserte Aufl. 989 S., 499 Abb. und 130 Tab. Verlag Eugen Ulmer. Stuttgart, 1982. Preis: Ln. m. Schutzumschlag DM 120.— , 1984 .

[24]  C. Peng,et al.  Toward dynamic global vegetation models for simulating vegetation–climate interactions and feedbacks: recent developments, limitations, and future challenges , 2010 .

[25]  A. Fischlin,et al.  Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services , 2007 .

[26]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[27]  A. Wolf,et al.  The relative importance of land use and climatic change in Alpine catchments , 2012, Climatic Change.

[28]  Qin Yu,et al.  Simulating Future Changes in Arctic and Subarctic Vegetation , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[29]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests , 2008 .

[30]  F. Kienast,et al.  A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland , 1993 .

[31]  A. Fischlin,et al.  Model convergence and state variable update in forest gap models , 1996 .

[32]  M. Cannell,et al.  Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming , 1989 .

[33]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[34]  Andreas Huth,et al.  The effects of tree species grouping in tropical rainforest modelling: Simulations with the individual-based model Formind , 1998 .

[35]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[36]  A. Wolf,et al.  Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region , 2008 .

[37]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground‐dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales, Australia , 1996, Journal of Biogeography.

[38]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species , 1993 .

[39]  R Colombo,et al.  European larch phenology in the Alps: can we grasp the role of ecological factors by combining field observations and inverse modelling? , 2008, International journal of biometeorology.

[40]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predictive Models of Forest Dynamics , 2008, Science.

[41]  L. Matías,et al.  Interactions between growth, demography and biotic interactions in determining species range limits in a warming world: the case of Pinus sylvestris , 2012 .

[42]  A. Wolf,et al.  Tree mortality in dynamic vegetation models – A key feature for accurately simulating forest properties , 2012 .

[43]  J. Mikola.  Provenance and Individual Variation in Climatic Hardiness of Scots Pine in Northern Finland , 1993 .

[44]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Parameter uncertainties in the modelling of vegetation dynamics — effects on tree community structure and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes , 2008 .

[45]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  GAPPARD: a computationally efficient method of approximating gap-scale disturbance in vegetation models , 2013 .

[46]  K. Erb.  Land use–related Changes in Aboveground Carbon Stocks of Austria’s Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2004, Ecosystems.

[47]  Mark R. Fulton,et al.  Adult recruitment as a function of juvenile growth rate in size- structured plant populations , 1991 .

[48]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Computer Models of Forest Succession , 1984 .

[49]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[50]  L. Kullman,et al.  Tree line population monitoring of Pinus sylvestris in the Swedish Scandes, 1973–2005: implications for tree line theory and climate change ecology , 2007 .

[51]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Climate change impacts on tree ranges: model intercomparison facilitates understanding and quantification of uncertainty. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[52]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Using a generalized vegetation model to simulate vegetation dynamics in northeastern USA , 2004 .

[53]  A. Wolf,et al.  Quantifying disturbance effects on vegetation carbon pools in mountain forests based on historical data , 2009 .

[54]  Thomas Giesecke,et al.  Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model , 2012 .

[55]  H. Bugmann.  A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients , 1996 .

[56]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale , 2006 .

[57]  H. Cowles.  The Journal of Ecology , 1914, Botanical Gazette.

[58]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901-2000) and 16 scenarios (2001-2100). , 2004 .