The Air Force/NASA Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) will provide two-dimensional images of the sky in visible light with high (0.1%) photometric precision, and unprecedented sky coverage and cadence. To optimize the information available from these images they must be interpreted in three dimensions. We have developed a Computer Assisted Tomography (CAT) technique that fits a three-dimensional kinematic heliospheric model to remotely-sensed Thomson scattering observations. This technique is designed specifically to determine the corotating background solar wind component from data provided by instruments like SMEI. Here, we present results from this technique applied to the Helios spacecraft photometer observations. The tomography program iterates to a least-squares solution of observed brightnesses using solar rotation, spacecraft motion and solar wind outflow to provide perspective views of each point in space covered by the observations. The corotational tomography described here is essentially the same as used by Jackson et al. (1998) for the analysis of interplanetary scintillation (IPS) observations. While IPS observations are related indirectly to the solar wind density through an assumed (and uncertain) relationship between small-scale density fluctuations and density, Thomson scattering physics is more straightforward, i.e., the observed brightness depends linearly on the solar wind density everywhere in the heliosphere. Consequently, Thomson scattering tomography can use a more direct density-convergence criterion to match observed Helios photometer brightness to brightness calculated from the model density. The general similarities between results based on IPS and Thomson scattering tomography validate both techniques and confirm that both observe the same type of solar wind structures. We show results for Carrington rotation 1653 near solar minimum. We find that longitudinally segmented dense structures corotate with the Sun and emanate from near the solar equator. We discuss the locations of these dense structures with respect to the heliospheric current sheet and regions of activity on the solar surface.
[1]
F. Crifo,et al.
Coronal transients: Loop or bubble?
,
1983
.
[2]
Bernard V. Jackson,et al.
Heliospheric tomography using interplanetary scintillation observations
,
1997
.
[3]
G. Woan,et al.
Synoptic IPS and Yohkoh soft X‐ray observations
,
1995
.
[4]
P. K. Manoharan,et al.
3. Correlation between speed and electron density fluctuations in the solar wind
,
1998
.
[5]
Bernard V. Jackson,et al.
Heliospheric tomography using interplanetary scintillation observations: 2. Latitude and heliocentric distance dependence of solar wind structure at 0.1–1 AU
,
1998
.
[6]
Bernard V. Jackson,et al.
Helios spacecraft and Earth perspective observations of three looplike solar mass ejection transients
,
1985
.
[7]
J. King,et al.
Solar radio burst and in situ determination of interplanetary electron density
,
1983
.
[8]
R. MacQueen,et al.
The three-dimensional structure of ‘loop-like’ coronal mass ejections
,
1993
.
[9]
W. A. Coles,et al.
Solar wind velocity estimation from multi-station IPS
,
1978
.
[10]
B. Jackson,et al.
Global Solar Wind Changes over Solar Cycle 21: A Combination of Helios Photometer, In Situ, and Interplanetary Scintillation Data
,
1998
.
[11]
J. T. Hoeksema,et al.
The structure of the heliospheric current sheet: 1978–1982
,
1983
.
[12]
B. Jackson,et al.
Solar coronal structure: A comparison of NSO/SP ground-based coronal emission line intensities and temperatures with Yohkoh SXT and WSO magnetic data
,
1996
.
[13]
Donald E. Billings,et al.
A Guide to the Solar Corona
,
2013
.
[14]
B. Jackson.
Imaging of coronal mass ejections by the HELIOS spacecraft
,
1985
.