Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy with minilaparotomy and morcellation in pigs.

Summary The aim of the present study was to determine and adapt surgery procedures of nephrectomy in domestic pigs. The procedures include surgical access, vessel preparation and ligation during transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. The experimental part of the study should help optimize similar techniques in dogs. Eight transperitoneal nephrectomies were performed on eight pigs, using either the intracorporal ligation with the surgical knot and minilaparotomy or titanium clips with a mechanical morcellation. Four ports were used: one 10 mm camera port, one 10 mm and two 5 mm working ports. After dissection of the peritoneum the renal vein, renal artery and ureter were separately occluded. Once these elements were sectioned the kidney was removed in an extraction sac by minilaparotomy or mechanical morcellation. No complications occurred during all operations, therefore a conversion to classic nephrectomy was not performed. After two monthsi observations post mortem examinations revealed differences in peritoneal adhesion formation in two groups of animals.

[1]  R. Hsi,et al.  Mechanisms of hemostatic failure during laparoscopic nephrectomy: review of Food and Drug Administration database. , 2007, Urology.

[2]  E. Wallen,et al.  Efficacy and safety of en bloc ligation of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[3]  M. Nicholson,et al.  Comparison of techniques of vascular control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The leicester experience. , 2006, Transplantation proceedings.

[4]  H. Shah,et al.  Are Titanium Clips for Control of the Renal Hilar Vessels as Unsafe as Generally Presumed? , 2006, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[5]  M. Büchler,et al.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Seung-June Oh,et al.  Open conversion from laparoscopic nephrectomy: slippage of surgical clips ligating the renal artery affected by atherosclerosis. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: morcellate or leave intact? Leave intact. , 2002, Reviews in urology.

[8]  P. Unger,et al.  Feasibility of pathological evaluation of morcellated kidneys after radical nephrectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[9]  R. Clayman,et al.  Laparoscopic renal ablation: an in vitro comparison of currently available electrical tissue morcellators. , 2000, Urology.

[10]  D. Gossot,et al.  A 3 trocar technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[11]  W. Richards,et al.  Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  D. Fentie,et al.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with morcellation for renal cell carcinoma: the Saskatoon experience. , 1998, Urology.

[13]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[14]  J. D. Sedlack,et al.  Laparoscopic knot security. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[15]  C. Swain,et al.  A comparison of the strength of knots tied by hand and at laparoscopy. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  J. Chovan,et al.  Laparoscopic Knot Strength: A Comparison With Conventional Knots , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Adhesion formation after transperitoneal nephrectomy: laparoscopic v open approach. , 1995, Journal of endourology.

[18]  D. Hunt,et al.  Is laparoscopy associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit. , 1995, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[19]  J. Cummings,et al.  Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[20]  P. Alken,et al.  The technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, adrenalectomy and nephroureterectomy. , 1993, European urology.