The Limitations and Opportunities of Business Process Re-engineering in a Politicized Organizational Climate

This paper is concerned with the organizationalchange and project management issues raised by theimplementation of a business process re-engineering(BPR) approach in the politicized hospital context. This is a report of research in progress,focusing on the issues arising at the problem definitionand project planning stages of a BPR application in anoperating theaters department experiencing problems with scheduling and delays. The research designrelies on a case study approach, with the researcher asparticipant observer, as both an adviser to the projectteam and as field interviewer. The paper argues that an ambitious BPR agenda is compromised inat least two regards. First, the lack of precisionsurrounding the focus and methodology of BPR givespolitically motivated actors considerable influence with respect to defining terms of reference in wayswhich will shape potential outcomes in their favor.Second, the complexity and indeterminacy of the businessprocess or “patient trail” can also diluteredesign attempts. The principal limitations of theapproach thus concern the impracticality of embarking onrapid and radical change working from a “blanksheet of paper” with respect to organizational and job design. BPR, unlike other organizationdevelopment interventions, is not a “contextsensitive” approach. The role of project manageris critical in establishing a working balance betweenindividual, occupational, and organizational goals in a manner perceivedto be legitimate in the context. Effective BPR projectmanagement thus requires a combination of political andprocess analysis skills. The principal opportunities of BPR derive from its process orientation,which brings a fresh perspective to a traditionally andfunctionally fragmented organizational setting, andwhich presents a potentially valuable platform for anevolutionary approach to process improvement.

[1]  Schaffer Rh,et al.  Successful change programs begin with results. , 1992 .

[2]  Joan C. Woodward,et al.  Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control , 1970 .

[3]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[4]  Management: the one disease consultants did not think existed. , 1994, Journal of management in medicine.

[5]  R. Kanter The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work , 1985 .

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Business process re-engineering in theory and practice : business paradise regained? , 1995 .

[7]  P. Yetton,et al.  Business Process Redesign: A Critique of Process Innovation by Thomas Davenport as a Case Study in the Literature , 1993 .

[8]  Allan P. O. Williams,et al.  Changing culture : new organizational approaches , 1989 .

[9]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[10]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When giants learn to dance : mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s , 1992 .

[11]  John Taylor,et al.  Don't obliterate, informate!: BPR for the information age , 1995 .

[12]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[13]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  The odd couple?: re‐engineering business processes; managing human relations , 1995 .

[14]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[15]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Re‐engineering organizations: a critical appraisal , 1995 .

[16]  A. Taket Shaping Strategic Change: Making Change in Large Organisations—The Case of The National Health Service , 1992 .

[17]  S. DAVID M. KING,et al.  Productivity and Social Organization , 1958, Nature.

[18]  Alan Cowling,et al.  Turning Doctors Into Managers: an Evaluation of A Major Nhs Initiative to Improve the Managerial Capabilities of Medical Consultants , 1994 .