A metric for characterizing the effectiveness of thermal mass in building materials

Building energy use represents approximately 25% of the average total global energy consumption (for both residential and commercial buildings). Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) – in most climates – embodies the single largest draw inside our buildings. In many countries around the world a concerted effort is being made towards retrofitting existing buildings to improve energy efficiency. Better windows, insulation, and ducting can make drastic differences in the energy consumption of a building HVAC system. Even with these improvements, HVAC systems are still required to compensate for daily and seasonal temperature swings of the surrounding environment. Thermal mass inside the thermal envelope can help to alleviate these swings. While it is possible to add specialty thermal mass products to buildings for this purpose, commercial uptake of these products is low. Common building interior building materials (e.g. flooring, walls, countertops) are often overlooked as thermal mass products, but herein we propose and analyze non-dimensional metrics for the ‘benefit’ of selected commonly available products. It was found that location-specific variables (climate, electricity price, material price, insolation) can have more than an order of magnitude influence in the calculated metrics for the same building material. Overall, this paper provides guidance on the most significant contributors to indoor thermal mass, and presents a builder- and consumer-friendly metric to inform decisions about which products could best improve the thermal behavior of the structure.

[1]  Hongfa Di,et al.  Ideal thermophysical properties for free-cooling (or heating) buildings with constant thermal physical property material , 2006 .

[2]  Xin Wang,et al.  New concepts and approach for developing energy efficient buildings: Ideal specific heat for building internal thermal mass , 2011 .

[3]  M. Santamouris,et al.  Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions , 2011 .

[4]  S. A. Al-Sanea,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on performance of insulated building walls and the concept of energy savings potential , 2012 .

[5]  Dan Zhou,et al.  Parametric analysis of influencing factors in Phase Change Material Wallboard (PCMW) , 2014 .

[6]  J Guillaume,et al.  The Home Depot , 2014 .

[7]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  A concept for a potential metric to characterise the dynamic thermal performance of walls , 2012 .

[8]  Todd Otanicar,et al.  Prospects for solar cooling – An economic and environmental assessment , 2012 .

[9]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Improvement of the thermal inertia of building materials incorporating PCM. Evaluation in the macroscale , 2013 .

[10]  Yaolin Lin,et al.  Coupling of thermal mass and natural ventilation in buildings , 2008 .

[11]  S. C. Kaushik,et al.  Thermal comfort in buildings through a mixed water-mass thermal storage wall , 1989 .

[12]  Dan Zhou,et al.  Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials (PCMs) in building applications , 2012 .

[13]  Hongfa Di,et al.  Application of latent heat thermal energy storage in buildings: State-of-the-art and outlook , 2007 .

[14]  S. A. Al-Sanea,et al.  Effect of masonry material and surface absorptivity on critical thermal mass in insulated building walls , 2013 .

[15]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  The role of thermal mass on the cooling load of buildings. An overview of computational methods , 1996 .

[16]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on the thermal performance of various Australian residential constructions systems , 2008 .

[17]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  Review of PCM based cooling technologies for buildings , 2012 .

[18]  Todd Otanicar,et al.  Socioeconomic impacts of heat transfer research , 2012 .

[19]  S. Kalaiselvam,et al.  Sustainable thermal energy storage technologies for buildings: A review , 2012 .