Application of chaos analysis to pressure fluctuation data from a fluidized bed dryer containing pharmaceutical granule

The S-statistic, a statistical test between chaotic attractors for fluidized systems introduced by van Ommen et al. [J.R. van Ommen, Monitoring fluidized bed hydrodynamics, PhD thesis, Technical University of Delft (2001).; AIChe J., 46 (11) (2000), 2183] has been applied to pressure fluctuations collected in a conical fluidized bed of dry pharmaceutical granule as well as a fluidized bed of wet granule as it progresses to the dry state. In a dry bed, the S-statistic has been found sensitive to the particle size distribution (PSD). Changes in bed hydrodynamics arising from PSD have been found to be most easily resolved at low gas velocities, indicating segregation at superficial velocities less than 2 m/s. In a drying bed, two stable states have been identified. These states correspond to visual observations of the presence of a centralized core of bubbles in a bed of high moisture content and more uniform fluidization throughout the bed cross-section toward the end of the drying process. The effect of moisture has been found to dominate the hydrodynamic changes taking place within the bed in the drying process identified with the S-statistic. The hydrodynamic changes identified by the S-statistic are not discerned by frequency and amplitude analysis techniques. Response of the S-statistic to the hydrodynamic changes associated with drying indicates the potential application of this technique to the quantification of fluidized bed hydrodynamic behavior.

[1]  Grebogi,et al.  Self-organization and chaos in a fluidized bed. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  John R. Grace,et al.  Characteristics of gas-fluidized beds in different flow regimes , 1999 .

[3]  C. Diks,et al.  Detecting differences between delay vector distributions. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  M. Hartman,et al.  Identification of the state of a fluidized bed by pressure fluctuations , 2000 .

[5]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Application of mutual information theory to fluid bed temperature and differential pressure signal analysis , 1995 .

[6]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  Chaotic behavior of fluidized beds based on pressure and voidage fluctuations , 1997 .

[7]  R. V. Ommen Monitoring Fluidized Bed Hydrodynamics , 2001 .

[8]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[9]  Takens,et al.  Estimation of the dimension of a noisy attractor. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Cor M. van den Bleek,et al.  Early warning of agglomeration in fluidized beds by attractor comparison , 2000 .

[11]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Prediction of fluidized bed behaviour in the presence of liquid bridges , 2001 .

[12]  Steven L McDougall,et al.  On-line detection of bed fluidity in a fluidized bed coker , 2003 .

[13]  Cedric Briens,et al.  The calculation of the characteristics of a chaotic attractor in a gas-solid fluidized bed , 1995 .

[14]  Edward T. White,et al.  Control of the quality of fluidization in a tall bed using the variance of pressure fluctuations , 1987 .

[15]  Jc Jaap Schouten,et al.  Origin, propagation and attenuation of pressure waves in gas-solid fluidized beds , 1998 .

[16]  S. Saxena,et al.  Diagnostic procedures for establishing the quality of fluidization of gas-solid systems , 1993 .

[17]  J. Raper,et al.  Examination of dispersed liquid-phase three-phase fluidized beds Part 1. Non-porous, uniform particle systems , 1998 .

[18]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Characterization of fluidization regimes by time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations , 2000 .