Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling.

Perhaps the most striking aspect of gambling behavior is that people continue to gamble despite persistent failure. One reason for this persistence may be that gamblers evaluate outcomes in a biased manner. Specifically, gamblers may tend to accept wins at face value but explain away or discount losses. Experiment 1 tested this hypothesis by recording subjects' explanations of the outcomes of their bets on professional football games. The results supported the hypothesis: Subjects spent more time explaining their losses than their wins. A content analysis of these explanations revealed that subjects tended to discount their losses but "bolster" their wins Finally, subjects remembered their losses better during a recall test 3 weeks later. Experiments 2 and 3 extended this analysis by demonstrating that a manipulation of the salience or existence of a critical "fluke" play in a sporting event had a greater impact on the subsequent expectations of those who had bet on the losing team than of those who had bet on the winning team. Both the implications and the possible mechanisms underlying these biases are discussed.

[1]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy? , 1979, Cognition.

[3]  E. Langer The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[4]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[5]  C. Dweck,et al.  Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children , 1973 .

[6]  R. Hastie,et al.  Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. , 1979 .

[7]  R. Herman Gamblers and gambling: Motives, institutions, and controls , 1976 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[9]  Alex Rubner,et al.  The economics of gambling , 1966 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen , 1979, Cognition.

[11]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[12]  S. Rosenzweig An experimental study of 'repression' with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration. , 1943 .

[13]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. , 1981 .

[14]  R. W. White Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[15]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. , 1978 .

[17]  A. Greenwald The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[18]  A. F. Glixman Recall of completed and incompleted activities under varying degrees of stress. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[20]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. , 1967, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[22]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[23]  D. Hamilton A Cognitive -Attributional Analysis of Stereotyping1 , 1979 .

[24]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. , 1969, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments , 1982 .

[26]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[27]  B. Zeigarnik On finished and unfinished tasks. , 1938 .

[28]  C. Dweck The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. , 1975 .

[29]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[30]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Attributions in the Sports Pages , 1980 .

[31]  L. Ross,et al.  The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. . , 1977 .

[32]  C. Dweck,et al.  An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. , 1981 .

[34]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content , 1972 .

[35]  B. Weiner Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[36]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[37]  C. Dweck,et al.  An Analysis of Learned Helplessness: Continuous Changes in Performance, Strategy, and Achievement Cognitions Following Failure. , 1978 .

[38]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying. , 1972 .