Partial weight-bearing gait using conventional assistive devices.

OBJECTIVE To determine if subjects can offload the right lower extremity to a targeted amount of weight bearing using assistive devices. DESIGN Case series. SETTING Motion analysis laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Ten healthy subjects (5 men, 5 women) without lower-extremity injury and minimal experience using ambulatory aids. INTERVENTIONS Before data collection subjects were trained by a physical therapist to offload the right lower extremity by 50% by using an assistive device and a bathroom scale for feedback on weight reduction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Vertical ground reaction force was measured by using forceplates while subjects walked at a self-selected speed by using a 3-point partial weight-bearing (PWB) gait pattern with axillary crutches, forearm crutches, and wheeled walker. We also measured vertical ground reaction force by using a single-point cane. RESULTS Each gait aid significantly reduced the right lower-extremity peak vertical ground reaction force. Participants were able to achieve the target of approximately 50% weight reduction with the axillary (50% reduction) and forearm (56% reduction) crutches. The wheeled walker resulted in a peak vertical load of 64% of body weight, which was in excess of the target load. A single-point cane produced a peak vertical load of 76% of body weight. CONCLUSIONS By using a bathroom scale, healthy subjects could be trained to achieve a target goal of 50% PWB with axillary and forearm crutches. A wheeled walker resulted in weight bearing greater than the target of 50% of body weight. Subjects were able to offload the right lower extremity by about 25% of body weight by using a single-point cane.

[1]  O. Scremin,et al.  Methods for estimating the proper length of a cane. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  A comparative analysis of several crutch-length-estimation techniques. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[3]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Forces and impulses during aided gait. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  F B Gray,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of partial weight-bearing instruction. , 1998, American journal of orthopedics.

[5]  G. Smidt,et al.  Floor reaction forces during gait: comparison of patients with hip disease and normal subjects. , 1973, Physical therapy.

[6]  G L Smidt,et al.  Effect of cane on variables of gait for patients with hip disorders. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[7]  S. Li,et al.  Three-point gait crutch walking: variability in ground reaction force during weight bearing. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  G L Smidt,et al.  System of reporting and comparing influence of ambulatory aids on gait. , 1980, Physical therapy.

[9]  Warren Cg,et al.  Training procedures and biofeedback methods to achieve controlled partial weight bearing: an assessment. , 1975 .

[10]  T. Boone,et al.  Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[11]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Low effectiveness of prescribed partial weight bearing. Continuous recording of vertical loads using a new pressure-sensitive insole. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.