Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors

This study is the first to investigate: (a) 'temporal performance fields,' whether the speed of information accrual differs for different locations at a fixed eccentricity, and (b) whether covert attention modulates temporal dynamics differentially at isoeccentric locations. Using the speed accuracy tradeoff (SAT) procedure, we derived conjoint measures of how isoeccentric locations and precueing targets location affect speed and accuracy in a search task. The results demonstrate the existence of temporal performance fields, analogous to spatial performance fields: information accrual was fastest for target on the horizontal meridian, intermediate for targets at the intercardinal locations, slow for targets on the vertical meridian, and slowest for targets at the North (N) location (accrual time pattern: E&W<intercardinal<S<N). Surprisingly, in contrast to spatial performance fields, where covert attention enhanced discriminability at all locations to a similar degree, attention differentially sped up processing at the slower locations, with a greater benefit evident along the vertical than the horizontal meridian, particularly at the N location, and an intermediate benefit at intercardinal locations (viz., N>S>intercardinal>E&W). Hence, the compensatory effect of attention eliminated the temporal asymmetries across isoeccentric locations.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[2]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[3]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[7]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[8]  D Regan,et al.  Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  M. Morgan,et al.  Visual Search for a Tilted Target: Tests of Spatial Uncertainty Models , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[11]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks--identification, yes/no detection and localization. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[12]  M. Morgan,et al.  Contrast discrimination function: spatial cuing effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  H. Brettel,et al.  The peripheral critical flicker frequency , 1979, Vision Research.

[14]  David C Burr,et al.  Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  F. Kitterle Psychophysics of lateral tachistoscopic presentation , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[18]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[20]  M. Eckstein The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .

[21]  B. Dosher Effect of Sentence Size and Network Distance on Retrieval Speed. , 1982 .

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[23]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[27]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Enhanced Perception of Illusory Contours in the Lower Versus Upper Visual Hemifields , 1996, Science.

[28]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[29]  S. McKee,et al.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field , 1984, Vision Research.

[30]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency , 1998, Vision Research.

[35]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[36]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[37]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[38]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Vision Research.

[39]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[41]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[42]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[43]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[46]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[47]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Stimulus discriminability in visual search , 1994, Vision Research.

[49]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[50]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[51]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[52]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[55]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[56]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Express attentional shifts , 1993, Vision Research.

[57]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[58]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[61]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[62]  S. Yantis 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[63]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Visual Motion Sensation Yielded by Non-visually Driven Attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[64]  Graham K Edgar,et al.  Hemifield Differences in Perceived Spatial Frequency , 1990, Perception.

[65]  John C. Schmitt,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time , 1977 .

[66]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PREPARATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN MAN , 1987 .

[67]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The representation of the visual field in parvicellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[68]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II. Retinotopic organization , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[69]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[70]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[71]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[72]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: Representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[73]  B. McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. , 1998 .

[74]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[75]  P. Lennie Single Units and Visual Cortical Organization , 1998, Perception.

[76]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  The Effect of Attentional Spread on Spatial Resolution , 1997, Vision Research.

[77]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Spatial attention and vernier acuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[78]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[79]  Paul Azzopardi,et al.  Uneven mapping of magnocellular and parvocellular projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus to the striate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1999, Vision Research.

[80]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[81]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[82]  M Mackeben,et al.  The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies , 2000, Vision Research.

[83]  David Whitaker,et al.  Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field , 1993, Vision Research.

[84]  M Mackeben,et al.  Sustained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[85]  W. Geisler,et al.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.

[86]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.