Differing default mode network activities in men with homosexual or heterosexual preferences.

INTRODUCTION Neuroimaging studies have reported differences in brain structure and function between homosexual and heterosexual men. The neural basis for homosexual orientation, however, is still unknown. AIM This study characterized the association of homosexual preference with measures of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) and functional connectivity (FC) in the resting state. METHODS We collected echo planar magnetic resonance imaging data in 26 healthy homosexual men and 26 age-matched heterosexual men in the resting state. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sexual orientation was evaluated using the Kinsey scale. We assessed group differences in fALFF and then, taking the identified group differences as seed regions, we compared groups on measures of FC from those seeds. The behavioral significance of the group differences in fALFF and FC was assessed by examining their associations with the Kinsey scores. RESULTS Compared with heterosexual participants, homosexual men showed significantly increased fALFF in the right middle frontal gyrus and right anterior cerebellum, and decreased fALFF in the left postcentral gyrus, left lingual gyrus, right pallidum, right postcentral gyrus, left interior parietal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, left cuneus, and left inferior frontal gyrus. Additionally, fALFF in the left postcentral gyrus and left cuneus correlated positively with Kinsey scores in the homosexual participants. When the seeds in the left cuneus, left cuneus, and left superior parietal gyrus also had reduced FC in homosexual participants, FC correlated positively with the Kinsey scores. CONCLUSIONS Differences in fALFF and FC suggest male sexual preference may influence the pattern activity in the default mode network.

[1]  Yong He,et al.  Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  C Francome,et al.  Sexual behavior. , 1982, BMJ.

[4]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Dost Öngür,et al.  Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  G. Sanders,et al.  Sexual Orientation Differences in Cerebral Asymmetry and in the Performance of Sexually Dimorphic Cognitive and Motor Tasks , 1997, Archives of sexual behavior.

[7]  N. Costes,et al.  Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[8]  S.-h. Hu,et al.  Patterns of Brain Activation during Visually Evoked Sexual Arousal Differ between Homosexual and Heterosexual Men , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Ivanka Savic,et al.  PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: A neurobiological hypothesis , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Treatment of baseline drifts in fMRI time series analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  David C. Zhu,et al.  Gender Differences in Brain Activation on a Mental Rotation Task , 2012, The International journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Association of Cerebral Networks in Resting State with Sexual Preference of Homosexual Men: A Study of Regional Homogeneity and Functional Connectivity , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Y. Zang,et al.  Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI , 2007, Brain and Development.

[16]  Chaozhe Zhu,et al.  An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: Fractional ALFF , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  Alexa M. Morcom,et al.  Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Fransson Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  P. Reber,et al.  Neural correlates of sexual arousal in homosexual and heterosexual men. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  Rozmin Halari,et al.  Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual–spatial attention allocation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michael Forsting,et al.  Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in heterosexual and homosexual males , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[22]  V. Haughton,et al.  Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in "resting-state" data. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  B. Jeong,et al.  Plasma Concentration of Prolactin, Testosterone Might Be Associated with Brain Response to Visual Erotic Stimuli in Healthy Heterosexual Males , 2009, Psychiatry investigation.

[26]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[27]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[29]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  The oscillating brain: Complex and reliable , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  Clyde E. Martin,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[31]  S. Kühn,et al.  A quantitative meta-analysis on cue-induced male sexual arousal. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[32]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  G. Wilson,et al.  Performance Differences Between Adult Heterosexual and Homosexual Men on the Digit-Symbol Substitution Subtest of the WAIS-R , 2004, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[34]  Ivanka Savic,et al.  Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  S. F. Witelson,et al.  A cognitive profile of homosexual men compared to heterosexual men and women , 1991, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[36]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[38]  Kâmil Uğurbil,et al.  A voxel-by-voxel parametric fMRI study of motor mental rotation: hemispheric specialization and gender differences in neural processing efficiency , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Yingli Lu,et al.  Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.