Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments

This papersurveys recently developed analytical methods for studying thesensitivity of DEA results to variations in the data. The focusis on the stability of classification of DMUs (Decision MakingUnits) into efficient and inefficient performers. Early workon this topic concentrated on developing solution methods andalgorithms for conducting such analyses after it was noted thatstandard approaches for conducting sensitivity analyses in linearprogramming could not be used in DEA. However, some of the recentwork we cover has bypassed the need for such algorithms. Evolvingfrom early work that was confined to studying data variationsin only one input or output for only one DMU at a time, the newermethods described in this paper make it possible to determineranges within which all data may be varied for any DMU beforea reclassification from efficient to inefficient status (or vice versa) occurs. Other coverage involves recent extensionswhich include methods for determining ranges of data variationthat can be allowed when all data are varied simultaneously for all DMUs. An initial section delimits the topics to be covered.A final section suggests topics for further research.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming , 1961 .

[2]  A. Charnes,et al.  Structural sensitivity analysis in linear programming and an exact product form left inverse , 1968 .

[3]  James N. Kremer,et al.  Sensitivity and Stability , 1978 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Management Science Relations for Evaluation and Management Accountability , 1979 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Sensitivity and stability analysis in dea , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data development analysis , 1986 .

[9]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Efficiency characterizations in different DEA models , 1988 .

[11]  Yuji Ijiri,et al.  Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Science of Management , 1988 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  A Comparison of DEA and Translog Estimates of Production Frontiers Using Simulated Observations from a Known Technology , 1988 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities , 1989 .

[14]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Classification transitions under expansion of inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis , 1989 .

[15]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[17]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[18]  井尻 雄士 Creative and innovative approaches to the science of management , 1993 .

[19]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Measures with Applications to Kansas Farming and Illinois Coal Mining , 1994 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A DEA Bibliography (1978–1992) , 1994 .

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[23]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[24]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Chapter 11 Simulation studies of efficiency, returns to scale and misspecification with nonlinear functions in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[25]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Chapter 5 Duality, classification and slacks in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[26]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Chapter 15 DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing textiles corporation , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[27]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  Chapter 7 DEA multiplier analytic center sensitivity with an illustrative application to independent oil companies , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  Richard A. Tapia,et al.  Chapter 6 On the construction of strong complementarity slackness solutions for DEA linear programming problems using a primal-dual interior-point method , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[29]  S. Grosskopf Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey , 1996 .

[30]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[31]  A. Charnes,et al.  Sensitivity and stability of efficiency classifications in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[32]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming [management performance studies] , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[33]  Betty L. Hickman,et al.  Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix , 1997 .

[34]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[35]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[37]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Valter Boljuncic,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in the additive model of data envelopment analysis , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[39]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[40]  Valter Boljuncic A note on robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[42]  L. Neralic,et al.  Evaluation of robustness of decision making unit using dual multipliers , 1999 .

[43]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Sensitivity and Stability of the Classifications of Returns to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[44]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[45]  Finding the Frontier: Methodological Advances in DEA , 1999 .

[46]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[47]  Stephen Haag,et al.  Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to development indexes , 2000 .

[48]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Measures in DEA with an Application to the Malmquist Index , 2000 .

[49]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Efficiencies of Turbofan Jet Engines: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2000 .

[50]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  New Tools for Dealing with Errors-in-Variables in DEA , 2000 .

[51]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  W. Cooper,et al.  Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries (1981-1997) , 2001 .